INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE COURT CAMPUS BEAWAR vs. ANANT KUMAR SHAH, BEAWAR
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing rebate under Section 87A on income chargeable at special rates (short-term capital gains). The assessee had opted for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A) and claimed the rebate. The CPC had initially denied this rebate via a rectification order.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to rebate under Section 87A on taxes paid on short-term capital gains. There is no express bar in Section 87A or Section 111A denying this rebate, and the prospective amendment in the Finance Bill 2025 supports this interpretation for the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is allowable on short-term capital gains taxable at special rates when the assessee opts for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 111A,Section 115BAC(1A),Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
Per Annapurna Gupta, AM:- The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal Addl./JCIT(A) Bhubaneswar(hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 09.02.2026 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
P a g e | 2 Anant Kumar Shah
The grounds raised read as under:- 1. . Whether on the facts & circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing rebate u/s 87A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on income chargeable to tax at special rates u/s 111A, without appreciating the statutory scheme of Chapter XII read with section 115BAC(1A), which treats such income as a distinct class liable to tax a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026