SHREY JAIN,JODHPUR vs. AO, JODHPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a rebate under Section 87A on short-term capital gains. The CPC denied this rebate while processing the return, and the CIT(A) upheld this denial. The assessee's total income did not exceed Rs. 7,00,000 and they had opted for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 87A provides rebate on the entire tax liability computed on total income without distinguishing between normal and special rate incomes. The proviso to Section 87A and the non-obstante clause in Section 115BAC(1A) do not exclude special rate incomes from the rebate calculation for the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is available on short-term capital gains taxable at special rates under Section 111A, especially when the assessee has opted for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, “SMC” BENCH, JODHPUR
Per Annapurna Gupta, AM:- The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A)-02 Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”),
P a g e | 2 Shrey Jain dated 04.12.2025 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The grounds raised by the assessee read as under:-
The Learned AO CPC has wrongly denial u/s 87A rebate on such special rate of income like short term capital gain Rs.3,88,713 tax rebate 87A Rs. 25,000. Since in the absence of any specific provision expressly denying 87A rebate, like sub section (6) of section 112A in case of long-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
- Income Tax Officer, Ncrb, Statue Circle… vs Akshat Jain, JaipurITA 1131/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026