NAVED INVESTMENT AND TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee's return of income was treated as defective under Section 139(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for not submitting a tax audit report when claiming business income exceeding Rs. 1 crore. The assessee's appeal against this defect notice was dismissed by the CIT(A) as non-appealable.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an order treating a return as defective under Section 139(9) is appealable under Section 246A(1)(a) as it can create a liability or jeopardize a refund. Therefore, the CIT(A)'s dismissal was set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether a notice treating a return of income as defective under Section 139(9) is appealable before the CIT(A) under Section 246A(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139(9),Section 246A(1)(a),Section 143(1),Section 237
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SMT.BEENA PILLAI & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :- The present appeal emanating from the appellate order dated 13.11.2025 is preferred by the assessee against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeal, Addl/JCIT(A) Faridabad [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to assessment order
P a g e | 2 A.Y. 2022-23 Naved Investment and Trading Company Private Limited passed u/s. 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] dated 14.12.2022 for the Assessment Year [A.Y.] 202
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139(9)
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Pintu Babulal Purohit, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2)(2), BangaloreITA 136/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ravi Rajgarhia, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 33(1), KolkataITA 1284/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Harvinder Singh, Karnal vs ITO Ward 1 Karnal, KarnalITA 3219/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026