AMULYA KUMAR DAS,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD 1(1), CUTTACK
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retired employee of a PSU, received leave encashment. The Assessing Officer allowed exemption up to Rs. 3,00,000, adding the balance. The assessee appealed, citing a CBDT notification that increased the exemption limit to Rs. 25,00,000.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the increased exemption limit under Section 10(10AA)(ii) is applicable. Therefore, the entire leave encashment received by the assessee is eligible for exemption.
What were the issues?
Whether the enhanced exemption limit for leave encashment under Section 10(10AA)(ii) applies retrospectively to the assessee's case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
PerBench: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2019-20/10076235 order dated17/03/2023 for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. Satyanarayan Jethi, AR appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
The appeal is filed by the assessee with a delay of 1035 days. The assessee has filed a condonation petition which is further supported by an affidavit for condonation of delay. The reasons gi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10AA)(ii)
- Satishkumar Mansinh Bhuria, Bharuch vs ITO, Ward-1, AgartalaITA 190/GTY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Srinivasa Mohan Tumati, Tenali vs DCIT, Circle 42(3)(1), MumbaiITA 4082/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Srinivasa Mohan Tumati, Tenali vs DCIT, Circle 42(3)(1), MumbaiITA 4081/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Gopalakrishnan Sriram, Chennai vs ITO, Ncw-4(6), ChennaiITA 1525/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajendra Kumar, Ranchi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-W2(1), RanchiITA 116/RAN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026