GOPALAKRISHNAN SRIRAM,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-4(6), CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retired bank employee, received leave encashment of Rs. 12,27,232/-. He claimed an exemption of Rs. 3,00,000/- as per the then-prevailing limit. Subsequently, the exemption limit for non-government employees was enhanced to Rs. 25,00,000/- retrospectively.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the enhanced exemption limit of Rs. 25,00,000/- under Section 10(10AA)(ii) is applicable retrospectively to the assessee's case. Since the leave encashment received was within this enhanced limit, the entire amount is eligible for exemption.
What were the issues?
Whether the retrospective enhancement of the leave encashment exemption limit for non-government employees is applicable to the assessee's assessment year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order dated 25.02.2026, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, ADDL/JCIT(A)-1, Lucknow (in short “ld.CIT(A)”) for the assessment year (A.Y) 2020-21 against the order of u/s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) passed by the CPC, Bangaluru (AO), dated 13.12.2020. 2. The only issue raised
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10AA)(ii)
- Satishkumar Mansinh Bhuria, Bharuch vs ITO, Ward-1, AgartalaITA 190/GTY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Srinivasa Mohan Tumati, Tenali vs DCIT, Circle 42(3)(1), MumbaiITA 4082/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Srinivasa Mohan Tumati, Tenali vs DCIT, Circle 42(3)(1), MumbaiITA 4081/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajendra Kumar, Ranchi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-W2(1), RanchiITA 116/RAN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
- Siddharth Balukeswar Sar, Navi Mumbai vs Assessing Officer, MumbaiITA 4050/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026