SIDDHARTH BALUKESWAR SAR,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to repeated non-compliance. The assessee had challenged the assessment on grounds of inadequate opportunity and disputed various deductions and exemptions.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to examine all issues on merits after affording the assessee an effective opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex parte without considering the merits of the deductions and exemptions claimed by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 10(13A),Section 10(14),Section 10(5),Section 10(10),Section 10(10AA)(ii),Section 80C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E’ BENCH
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for Assessment Year 2019-20, arising out of the assessment framed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2 Siddharth Balukeshwar SAR
When the appeal was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice. We, therefore, proceed to dispose of the appeal ex parte qua the assessee after hearing the learned Departmental Representative and perusing the material available on record.
We have considered the impugned order, the grounds of appeal and the material placed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026