SRINIVASA MOHAN TUMATI,TENALI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 42(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retired employee of NABARD, claimed exemption for leave encashment under Section 10(10AA)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer processed the returns under Section 143(1), restricting the deduction to ₹3 lakhs, despite the assessee claiming amounts higher than this limit.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that private employees are also eligible for the exemption of leave encashment up to ₹25 lakhs as per the CBDT notification. Following various co-ordinate benches, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, a non-government employee, is entitled to claim exemption for leave encashment up to ₹25 lakhs as per the CBDT notification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two appeals are filed by the assessee against different orders of the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Madurai, dated 24.02.2026, for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2023-24. ITA 4081 & 4082/MUM/2026 SRINIVASA MOHAN TUMATI
The only contro
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10AA)(ii)
- Satishkumar Mansinh Bhuria, Bharuch vs ITO, Ward-1, AgartalaITA 190/GTY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Srinivasa Mohan Tumati, Tenali vs DCIT, Circle 42(3)(1), MumbaiITA 4081/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Gopalakrishnan Sriram, Chennai vs ITO, Ncw-4(6), ChennaiITA 1525/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajendra Kumar, Ranchi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-W2(1), RanchiITA 116/RAN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
- Siddharth Balukeswar Sar, Navi Mumbai vs Assessing Officer, MumbaiITA 4050/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026