PRAMA METTA ORPHANES TRUST ,GAYA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD-1, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals before the CIT(A) and remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal noted that the CPC had treated gross receipts as income without considering expenditure.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed appeals against orders passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act. There was a substantial delay in filing these appeals before the CIT(A), which the CIT(A) refused to condone, dismissing the appeals in limine.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) should be condoned, and whether the CPC's processing of returns under Section 143(1)(a) by treating gross receipts as income without considering expenditure was correct.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
PER BENCH
All these three appeals filed by the same assessee against the separate orders passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Ld. Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad all dated 30.12.2025 [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)] DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-
2 ITA Nos. 135-137/PAT/2026 Prama Metta Orphanes Trust, Gaya 26/1084206701(1) for A.Y. 2014-15, DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/108420727(1) for A.Y. 2015-16 and DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1084207841(1) for A.Y. 2018-19 respectively and the grounds raised by the assessee which
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139(9)
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Pintu Babulal Purohit, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2)(2), BangaloreITA 136/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ravi Rajgarhia, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 33(1), KolkataITA 1284/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Harvinder Singh, Karnal vs ITO Ward 1 Karnal, KarnalITA 3219/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026