ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S BABU YUVRAJ SINGH SEWA SANASTHAN, FATEHPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee obtained registration under section 12A during the pendency of assessment proceedings, the benefit of exemption under sections 11 and 12 should be granted retrospectively as per CBDT Circular and judicial precedents. The AO's failure to apply the circular was a legal error.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust running schools, filed its return declaring nil income. The AO made additions for corpus donations and building fund as the trust was not registered under section 12A. The CIT(A) deleted these additions, granting retrospective benefit of section 12A registration obtained during assessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the benefit of section 12A registration obtained during assessment proceedings can be applied retrospectively for exemption under sections 11 and 12 for the assessment year in question.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 10(23C),Section 11(1)(d),Section 68,Section 143(3),Section 11,Section 12,Section 12A(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, J.M.:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 11.06.2020, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld. CIT(A)] for Assessment Year 2014-15. 2.0 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust, running several Schools. The assessee filed its income in ITR-7 for the year under consideration on 22.12.2014 declaring Nil income. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee furnished before the AO the copy of Registered Trust Deed dated
ITA No.263/LKW/2020 18.11.2004. The AO noticed that the assessee-Trust was not registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act’) and that
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026