ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF RAJASTHAN LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, NEAR STATUE CIRCLE
What were the facts?
The assessee, a joint venture company engaged in highway development, appealed against disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). These disallowances pertained to share capital expenses, expenses under Section 14A, and socio-economic expenses.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the share capital expenses were eligible for amortisation under Section 35D, the disallowance under Section 14A was unsustainable as no exempt income was earned, and the socio-economic expenses were allowable business expenditures. The penalty proceedings were dismissed as premature.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses for increasing authorised share capital are amortisable under Section 35D, whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible without exempt income, and if socio-economic expenses incurred under contractual obligations are allowable business expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned
Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Agra [hereinafter referred to as “the Addl./JCIT(A)”] dated 14.08.2025 for the Assessment Year 2014-15, arising out of the assessment order dated 27.12.2016 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-06, Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as “the AO”] under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
ITA No. 1425-JPR-2025 Road Infrastructure Development Company of Rajasthan Ltd.
The grounds of appeal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 35D
- DCIT-4(1), Indore vs Texmo Pipes and Products Limited, BurhanpurITA 423/IND/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Income Tax Officer Ward 7 1, Pune vs Sarsan Developers, PuneITA 460/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed4 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Sanraj Hospitality Private Ltd, Delhi vs ITO Ward 22(3), DelhiITA 7410/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Income Tax Officer-11(2)(1), Mumbai, Marine… vs Stoughton Street Tech Labs Private Limited…ITA 885/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer-11(2)(1), Mumbai, Marine… vs Stoughton Street Tech Labs Private Limited…ITA 885/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026