DCIT-4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. TEXMO PIPES AND PRODUCTS LIMITED, BURHANPUR
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) heard appeals concerning assessment years 2010-11 to 2016-17, arising from search and seizure operations. The assessee had surrendered a significant amount during the search, which they later sought to retract. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on this surrender, and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted most of these additions, sustaining only a portion.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus to prove that the balance sum for investment in Mangal Murti Minerals was not paid. Therefore, this specific issue was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee discharged its onus regarding unexplained investment in a partnership firm, and whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions made by the AO based on a retracted surrender.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 153A,Section 250,Section 35D,Section 14A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore Before Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Accountant Member And Shri Paresh M. Joshi, Judicial Member आयकरअपीलसं./IT(SS)A Nos.2, 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13/IND/2025 [ "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2016-17 ] Texmo Pipes And Products Limited, Deputy Commissioner of 98, Bahadarpur Road, Vs.
Income Tax, Central-1, Burhanpur, Aaykar Bhawan, Opp. White Madhya Pradesh-450331. Church, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AACCT9780D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
And आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 423/IND/2025 [ "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 ] Deputy Commissioner of Texmo Pipes And Products Income Tax-4(1), Vs.
Limited, Aaykar Bhawan, Opp. White 98, Bahadarpur Road, Burhanpur, Church, Indore, Madhya Madhya Pradesh-450331. Pradesh – 452001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AACCT9780D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
Appellant by : Shri Anil Kamal Garg with Shri Aayush Garg, CA Respondent by : Shri Anup Singh, CIT. DR Date of Hearing : 29/06/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 08/09/2026 :ORDER: Per, Bench: Captioned seven appeals filed by the assessee, and one cross-a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Legend Distilleries PVT. LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Scottmen Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilieries PVT LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026