TATA AIG INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(3), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a general insurance company, filed its return of income, which was later assessed at a significantly higher income by the Assessing Officer. The AO made several adjustments including transfer pricing, brought to tax profit on sale of investments, declined depreciation, and disallowed certain expenses.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. It held that profit on sale of investments, dividend income, and expenditure on computer peripherals were not taxable or disallowable. It also ruled that co-insurance fees were not subject to TDS under Section 194H.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the taxability of profit on sale of investments, allowability of depreciation, deductibility of expenses, transfer pricing adjustments for advertisement expenditure, and the applicability of TDS provisions to co-insurance fees.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 44,Section 32,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 92B,Section 10(34),Section 14A,Section 194H
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT BEENA PILLAI & SHRI JAGADISH
Per: SHRI JAGADISH, A.M.
These cross appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are directed against the order dated 13.12.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-58, Mumbai [“the learned CIT(A)”], in appeal No. CIT(A)-58/205/2014-15, arising out of the assessment order dated 26.05
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 44
- Asst CIT 8(3)(1), Mumbai vs Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd, MumbaiITA 2451/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2010-11
- DCIT, CC 6(2), Mumbai vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company…ITA 3282/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed20 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
- Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2842/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed20 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
- United India Insurance Co.Limited, Chennai vs PCIT-3, ChennaiITA 183/CHNY/2021[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
- United India Insurance Co.Ltd, Chennai vs PCIT-3, ChennaiITA 1759/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed5 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026