SUDESH SYNTHETIC MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), SURAT
What were the facts?
The assessee sold a factory land and building, bifurcating the sale consideration and treating land as long-term capital asset and building as short-term depreciable asset. The AO disagreed with the bifurcation, treating the entire sale consideration as relating to land and recomputing the capital gains.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the opening WDV of the building block was correctly claimed by the assessee as per Section 50 of the Act. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction of brokerage expenses incurred for the sale of the property.
What were the issues?
Whether the sale consideration of the property should be bifurcated between land and building, and whether the WDV of the building and brokerage expenses are allowable deductions for capital gains computation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 139,Section 142(1),Section 50,Section 48,Section 133(6),Section 194H
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by the order of first appeal dated 30.05.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order dated 24.12.2018 passed by learned Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 2(1)(2), Surat [“Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2016-17, the assessee has filed this appeal.
Sudesh Synthetic Mills Private Limited ITA No. 739/SRT/2024 – AY 2016-17
The background facts leading to pres
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139
- Venu Gopal Reddy Challa, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 525/HYD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Venu Gopal Reddy Challa, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle -12(1), HyderabadITA 524/HYD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Veera Mani Kumar Vatti Kooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1069/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Mukesh Mishra, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5853/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026