OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL GMBH,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) RANGE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that GST collected by the assessee on behalf of the government is not to be included in the taxable income under Section 44BB. This is because GST is a statutory levy collected in a fiduciary capacity and not part of the consideration for the carriage of goods or services.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Oceaneering International GmbH, appealed an order concerning the inclusion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in the computation of income under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act. This was a recurring issue previously decided in favour of the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether GST collected by a non-resident shipping company is to be included in the computation of income under the presumptive taxation provisions of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd.84 citing380 ITR 130 · 2016 · HC
- DIT v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd.82 citing414 ITR 1 · 2019 · HC
- 44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.21 citing234 Taxmann 818 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Knight Frank (India) Pvt. Ltd.9 citing72 Taxmann.com 300 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Vantage International Management Co.9 citing156 Taxmann.com 23 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “I” BENCH : MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M : This is an appeal filed by assessee against the order of the Assessing Officer (AO) passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), dated 19-08-2025, consequent to the directions given by the Dispute Resolution Panel [DRP-2], Mumbai-2, dated 02-07-2025, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24. 2. The limited issue under consideration relates to whether Goods and Service Tax (GST) is to be included while computing the income of the assessee in terms of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 44BB
- DCIT, Jaipur vs Oil India Ltd., AssamITA 1534/JPR/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- Dolphin Drilling Limited, Dehradun vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (…ITA 52/DDN/2020[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Dolphin Drilling Ltd, Noida vs ACIT, International Taxation, Circle- 2…ITA 5492/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
- Aban Singapore Pte Ltd, Chennai vs DCIT Intl Tax 1(1), ChennaiITTPA 29/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed12 Jun 2026AY 2023-24
- Baker Hughes Energy Technology Uk Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 2081/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 May 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026