CIT v. Vantage International Management Co.

156 Taxmann.com 23Supreme Court of India2023#11145 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Vantage International Management Co.

Orient Overseas Container Line Limited, Mumbai vs. DCIT (Int) Tax Circle 3(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6570/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Sandeep Singh Karhailorient Overseas Container Line Limited, C/O Oocl (India) Private Limited, Icc Chambers, 5Th Floor, Saki Vihar Road, Opp. Santogen Silk Mills, Powai, ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400072 Pan : Aaaco5679E V/S Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Circle – 3(2)(2), ……………… Respondent 6Th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400051

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil TiwariFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 153Section 244ASection 44B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Orient Overseas Container Line Limited, C/o OOCL (India) Private Limited, ICC Chambers, 5th Floor, Saki Vihar Road, Opp. Santogen Silk Mills, Powai, ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400072 PAN : AAACO5679E v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Circle – 3(2)(2), ……………… Respondent 6th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai - 400051 Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Tiwari Ms. Kajal Bhanushali Revenue by : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr.DR Date…

Aban Singapore Pte Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT Intl Tax 1(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1329/CHNY/2023[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 May 2024AY 2021-2022

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1329/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) & 2. Stay Application No.9/Chny/2024 (In Ita No.1329/Chny/2023) (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22) M/S. Aban Singapore Pte. Limited Dcit बनाम/ 113, Pantheon Road, Egmore S.O International Taxation-1(1), Vs. Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaqca-2845-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/Appellant By : Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao (Ca)-Ld. Ar !"थ"कीओरसे/ Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03-04-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17-05-2024

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao (CA)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 28Section 40Section 44ASection 44B

…the assessee has disclosed lower rate of profit. However, the said submissions could not be accepted since it is never the case of Ld. AO that the assessee has not offered income u/s 44BB. Secondly, in the case of CIT vs. Vantage International Management Co. (156 Taxmann.com 23), Hon’ble Supreme Court confirmed the stand of Hon’ble High Court holding that reimbursement of service tax ought not to be included in aggregate of amounts specified in clauses (a) and (b) of Sec. 44BB(2) since it was not an amount received by assessee on account of services provided by them in prospecting, extraction or production of min…

CIT v. Vantage International Management Co. (156 Taxmann.com 23) — Cited in 9 Judgments | BharatTax