44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.

62 Taxmann.com 24High Court2015#5686 most cited
21

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also reported as

234 Taxmann 818

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.

SAGARKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHAVANI,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-32(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 75/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.75/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Sagarkumar Ishwarbhai बिधम/ Ito, Ward-32(3)(3) Bhavani Room No. 105, C-Wing, Vs. 1St Floor, Kautilya D-103 D-103, Amozan Park Ii Devki Nagar Link Road, Bhavan, Bkc, Bandra Borivali-West-400103. (E), Mumbai-400051. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Agupb5616P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rakesh Joshi (Amicus Curiae) Revenue By: Shri Anil Gupta सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 02/03/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/05/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 16.12.2022 For Ay. 2016-17. 2. Grounds Raised By Assessee Are As Under: - “1. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Ao Erred In Wrongly Holding That Service Tax Is Liable To Be Included In The Turnover For The Purpose Of Tax Audit Which Is Against The Definition Of Turnover As Per Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India Guidelines. Without Prejudice To The Above 2. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Ao Erred In Adding An Amount Of Rs.8,31,631/- By Adopting Arbitrary Rate Of Net Profit @ 15% While Computing Income As Per Normal Provisions Of The Act & Wrongly Holding That The Appellant Is Outside The Purview Of Section 44Ad & The Cit(A) Erred In Partly Confirming The Same.

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi (Amicus Curiae)For Respondent: Shri Anil Gupta
Section 234ASection 274Section 28Section 30Section 44A

…bIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.75/Mum/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Sagarkumar Ishwarbhai बिधम/ ITO, Ward-32(3)(3) Bhavani Room No. 105, C-Wing, Vs. 1st Floor, Kautilya D-103 D-103, Amozan Park II Devki Nagar Link Road, Bhavan, BKC, Bandra Borivali-West-400103. (E), Mumbai-400051. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AGUPB5616P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rakesh Joshi (Amicus Curiae) Revenue by: Shri Anil Gupta सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 02/03/2023 घोषणा की ता…

DCIT 4(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. WEATHERFORD DRILLING INTERNATIONAL (BVI) LTD, MUMBAI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 3724/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3724/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बिाम/ Dcit(It) 4(3)(2) M/S. Weatherford Room No. 1728 Drilling International 17Th Floor, (Bvi) Ltd., V. Air India Building Unit 71 & 74, 7 Th Floor, Nariman Point Kalpataru Square, Mumbai 400021 Kondivita Lane, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacw7377F (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue By: Shri. C.S Sharma, Dr Assessee By : Shri. Kishan Kumar Mundhra सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 18.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Revenue, Being Ita No. 3724/Mum/2017, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Dated 23.02.2017 Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-58, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year 2010-11, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Assessment Order Dated 15.05.2013 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 144C(3) R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Assessment Year 2010-11. I.T.A. No.3724/Mum/2017

For Appellant: Shri. Kishan Kumar MundhraFor Respondent: Shri. C.S Sharma, DR
Section 144C(3)Section 44B

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “G” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3724/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बिाम/ DCIT(IT) 4(3)(2) M/s. Weatherford Room No. 1728 Drilling International 17th Floor, (BVI) Ltd., v. Air India Building Unit 71 & 74, 7 th Floor, Nariman Point Kalpataru Square, Mumbai 400021 Kondivita Lane, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN : AAACW7377F (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue by: Shri. C.S Sharma, DR A…

FORBES CONTAINER LINE PTE. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee company in ITA N0

ITA 972/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jul 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.972/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Forbes Container Line Pte. The Deputy Director Of बनाम/ Ltd., Income Tax (International V. Ground Floor, Taxation) – 3(2), Forbes Building, Scindia House, Charanjit Rai Marg, Fort, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400 001. Mumbai – 400038. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aabcf0967H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Smt. Pooja Swaroop,DR
Section 144Section 44BSection 5(2)Section 9

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “L” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “L” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.972/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Forbes Container Line Pte. The Deputy Director of बनाम/ Ltd., Income Tax (International v. Ground floor, Taxation) – 3(2), Forbes Building, Scindia House, Charanjit Rai Marg, Fort, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400 001. Mumbai – 400038. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AABCF0967H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee by Shri Girish Dave & Miss Kadambari Dave…

HANJIN SHIPPING COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (IT) 3(1),

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 5277/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Hanjin Shipping Company Deputy Director Of Income Tax Ltd., (International Taxation) – 3(1), C/O. Hanjin Shipping India Pvt. Mumbai Ltd. (Agent Of Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd.), 402, Vedanta, 779, Vs. Makwana Road, Off. Andheri Kurla Road, Marol Village, Andheri (East), Mumbai – 400 059 Pan: Aaach 3759G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Paras Savla, A.R. & Ms. Priyanka Gada, A.R. Revenue By : Shri Rahul Raman, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 23.03.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.05.2016

For Appellant: Shri Paras Savla, A.R. & Ms. Priyanka Gada, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman, D.R
Section 44B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/s. Hanjin Shipping Company Deputy Director of Income Tax Ltd., (International Taxation) – 3(1), C/o. Hanjin Shipping India Pvt. Mumbai Ltd. (Agent of Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd.), 402, Vedanta, 779, Vs. Makwana Road, Off. Andheri Kurla Road, Marol Village, Andheri (East), Mumbai – 400 059 PAN: AAACH 3759G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Paras Savla, A.R. & Ms. Priyanka Gada, A.R. Revenue by : Shri Rahul Raman, D.R. Date…

Showing 120 of 21 · Page 1 of 2