MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of R&D expenditure under Section 35(2AB) was partly allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the approval for the R&D facility, even if signed by an officer other than the Secretary, DSIR. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., filed an appeal against the assessment order for AY 2010-11. The primary dispute revolved around the disallowance of certain statutory duties/taxes claimed as deductions under Section 43B and the disallowance of R&D expenditure under Section 35(2AB).
What were the issues?
Whether statutory duties/taxes paid were deductible under Section 43B, and whether R&D expenditure was eligible for deduction under Section 35(2AB) despite issues with the approval certificate's signatory.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing378 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT1,183 citing328 ITR 81 · 2010 · HC
- CIT v. Excel Industries Ltd.935 citing358 ITR 295 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.543 citing326 ITR 1 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT516 citing203 Taxmann 364 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing323 ITR 518 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.444 citing248 Taxmann 55 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing257 Taxmann 2 · 2018 · SC
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley & Co.360 citing292 ITR 416 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Alembic Chemical Works Co. Ltd. v. CIT275 citing177 ITR 377 · 1989 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. Ericsson A.B256 citing204 Taxmann 192 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.218 citing339 ITR 632 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Claris Lifesciences Ltd.196 citing326 ITR 251 · 2010 · HC
- Berger Paints India Ltd. v. CIT181 citing266 ITR 99 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sadan Vikas (India) Ltd.112 citing335 ITR 117 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Metalman Auto P. Ltd.91 citing336 ITR 434 · 2011 · HC
- Carborandum Co. v. CIT87 citing108 ITR 335 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Sri Venkata Satyanarayana Rice Mill Contractors Co. v. CIT74 citing223 ITR 101 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Ciba India Ltd.65 citing69 ITR 692 · 1968 · SC
- CIT v. Samtel Color Ltd.63 citing184 Taxmann 120 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sutlej Cotton Mills Supply Agency Ltd.63 citing100 ITR 706 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Vinitec Corporation (P) Ltd.51 citing278 ITR 337 · 2005 · HC
- Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh v. CIT49 citing77 ITR 253 · 1970 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. IAEC (Pumps) Ltd.46 citing232 ITR 316 · 1998 · SC
- DIT v. HCL Infosystems Ltd.45 citing274 ITR 261 · 2005 · HC
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Riva Sharkar A Kothari44 citing283 ITR 338 · 2006 · HC
- CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.38 citing255 CTR 140 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “I” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM : The present cross appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2010-11 are directed against the order of Ld. DCIT, Circle- 16(1), New Delhi dated 20.01.2015. Both cross-appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue are being disposed off by way of this consolidated order for the sake of brevity and convenience.
ITA No.961/Del/2015 [Assessment Year : 2010-11
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026