Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.149

Section 80P(2)(d) falls under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 149 (Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 149 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80P(2)(d) is CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192), cited in 2,664 of the 2,440 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d)

CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.
88 ITR 192 · 1973 · Supreme Court
2,664
citing judgments

When two equally plausible interpretations of a taxing provision are possible, or when conflicting views exist from non-jurisdictional High Courts, the interpretation that favors the assessee must be adopted.

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
322 ITR 283 · 2010 · Supreme Court
1,283
citing judgments

The interest income earned by a cooperative society from investing its surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks is not "derived from" its eligible business activities and is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, thus not qualifying for deduction under Section 80P.

Pr. CIT v. Totagars
395 ITR 611 · 2017 · High Court
1,074
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus deposits or investments held with a cooperative bank is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT
431 ITR 1 · 2021 · Supreme Court
999
citing judgments

Section 80P(4) serves as a proviso to Section 80P(1) and (2), excluding only cooperative banks that are cooperative societies and possess an RBI license for banking business. Its purpose is to exclude cooperative banks operating like commercial banks that lend money to the public.

State Bank Of India v. CIT
389 ITR 578 · 2016 · High Court
817
citing judgments

Income arising from a cooperative society's surplus funds invested in short-term deposits and securities is not attributable to the society's core activities and, therefore, is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society
392 ITR 74 · 2017 · High Court
762
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a cooperative society from its investments or surplus deposits with a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.
306 ITR 392 · 2008 · Supreme Court
577
citing judgments

The "Purpose Test" determines whether an incentive or subsidy is a capital or revenue receipt for income tax purposes. If the incentive's purpose is to enable an assessee to set up a new industry or make investments in capital assets, it is a capital receipt and not taxable.

Subramanian and Anr. v. Siemens India Ltd. and Anr.
156 ITR 11 · 1985 · High Court
541
citing judgments

When there is a conflict between the decisions of non-jurisdictional High Courts, the view that favors the assessee should be preferred.

Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. v. ITO
230 Taxmann 309 · 2015 · High Court
527
citing judgments

A cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) if it is engaged in cooperative activities. It also clarifies the allowability of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income received from investments made in cooperative banks, after duly considering the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd.

Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ACIT
397 ITR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
499
citing judgments

A co-operative credit society engaged in banking business with the general public, accepting deposits from non-members and advancing loans to non-members, is treated as a co-operative bank. Such a society falls under the exclusionary clause of Section 80P(4) and is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

The Dad Cooperative Agri Multipurpose Society Limited Ludhiana, Ludhiana vs. Jao the Income Tax Officer Ward 3(1), Ludhiana

ITA 847/CHANDI/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Apr 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.847/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1264/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) The Dad Cooperative Agri Ito Ward 3(1) बनाम/ Vs. Multipurpose Society Ltd. Ludhiana - 141001 Vpo Dad, Ludhiana – 141108 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaabt-4860-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-04-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27-04-2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeals By Assessee For Assessment Years (Ay) 2018-19 & 2020-21 Have Identical Facts & Issues. First, We Take Up Appeal For Ay 2018-19 Which Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac [Cit(A)] Dated 21-11- 2024 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 143(3) On 12-03-2021. The Sole Issue That Arises In The Appeal Is Assessee’S

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

The Dad Cooperative Agri Multipurpose Society Limited, Ludhiana vs. Jao the Income Tax Officer Ward 3(1), Ludhiana

ITA 1264/CHANDI/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Apr 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.847/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & 2. आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1264/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21) The Dad Cooperative Agri Ito Ward 3(1) बनाम/ Vs. Multipurpose Society Ltd. Ludhiana - 141001 Vpo Dad, Ludhiana – 141108 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaabt-4860-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-04-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27-04-2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeals By Assessee For Assessment Years (Ay) 2018-19 & 2020-21 Have Identical Facts & Issues. First, We Take Up Appeal For Ay 2018-19 Which Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac [Cit(A)] Dated 21-11- 2024 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 143(3) On 12-03-2021. The Sole Issue That Arises In The Appeal Is Assessee’S

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

The University of Mumbai Employees Coop Credit Soc Ltd, Fort Mumbai vs. ITO Ward 30(1)(1), Mumbai, Bandra

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7858/MUM/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Apr 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21 The University Of Mumbai Vs Ito, Ward – 30(1)(1) Employees Coop Credit Society Kautilya Bhavan, Bkc, Ltd Mumbai – 400051. 222, University Building, Mg Road, Fort Mumbai - 400032 (Pan: Aaaat4466C) Appellant Respondent Present For: Appellant By : Shri Ritesh Gawande, Ca Respondent By : Ms. Kavita Kaushik, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.04.2026 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi / Cit(A), Vide Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2025-26/1081981928(1), Dated 24.10.2025, Passed Against The Assessment Order By Income Tax Officer, Ward - 30(1)(1), Mumbai U/S 143(3) R.W.S 144B Of The Income-Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”), Dated 30.08.2022, For Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under: 1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Assessing Officer, Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, ("The Ao) Erred In Not 2 The University Of Mumbai Employees Co-Op Credit Society Ltd Ay 2020-21 Allowing Deduction U/S. 80P (2) (A) (I) Of The Act In Respect Of The Interest Income Earned By The Appellant On The Deposits Kept By It With Co-Operative Banks.

For Appellant: Shri Ritesh Gawande, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Kavita Kaushik, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 3Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Ramchandradada Kawade Punya Nagari Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Pune vs. ITO 7(1), Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 379/PUN/2026[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Apr 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judicialmember I T A. No..379/Pun/2026 (A.Y.2017-18) Vs Ramchandradadakawade I.T.O.Ward 7(1), Punyanagarinagarisahakrai Aayakarsadan, . Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Bodhi Tower, S.No.66 Media Park, 548/2B, B T Kawade Road., Salasbury Park, Ghorpadi, Pune -411011 Pune-411037, Maharashtra. Maharashtra. Pan.No.Aaaap5734H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assesseeby Shri.Rajendrakadrekar&Siddheshwarhadi,Ar Revenue By Shri.Amitbobde, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 08.04.2026 17.04.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec143(3)R.W.S 263 & 250 Of The Act. The Assesse Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Nfac/Cit(A) Sustaining The Denial Of Claim Of Deduction U/Sec 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Act & Without Prejudice To Alternate/Obtaining Relief On Interest Income Earned On Deposits With The Co-Operative Banks. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That, The Assessee Is A Co- Operative Society Registered Under Maharashtra Societies

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80