Section 80G of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.133

Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 133 (Deduction in respect of donations to certain funds, charitable institutions, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 133 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80G is Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT (101 ITR 234), cited in 323 of the 6,482 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80G

Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT
101 ITR 234 · 1975 · Supreme Court
323
citing judgments

This case defines 'education' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act as systematic instruction, schooling, or training given to the young for preparation for the work of life. It clarifies that 'education' in this context has a narrow meaning, not extending to every acquisition of further knowledge.

CIT v. Nirav Modi
390 ITR 292 · 2017 · High Court
286
citing judgments

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263 merely on the ground of "inadequate enquiry" by the Assessing Officer (AO) if the AO has conducted an enquiry, examined evidence, and formed a possible view. For Section 263 to apply, the PCIT must demonstrate that the assessment order is both erroneous (contrary to law) and prejudicial to the revenue.

Vedabhai v. Santaram
253 ITR 798 · 2002 · Supreme Court
262
citing judgments

When substantial justice and technical considerations are in conflict, substantial justice should be prioritized. Condoning delay requires a cautious approach without malafide or dilatory tactics, and 'sufficient cause' should be interpreted liberally to advance substantial justice.

India Trade Promotion Organization v. DGIT(Exemption)
371 ITR 333 · 2015 · High Court
128
citing judgments

An institution engaged in the advancement of general public utility retains its charitable character and eligibility for exemptions under Section 11 or approval under Section 10(23C)(iv) provided profit is not its predominant motive, even if it generates incidental surpluses or collects fees.

Ananda Social and Educational Trust v. CIT
426 ITR 340 · 2020 · Supreme Court
116
citing judgments

For registration under Section 12AA, the Commissioner (Exemptions) must examine the objects of the trust and the genuineness of its proposed activities, even if the trust has not yet commenced actual charitable activities or incurred expenditure.

CIT v. ITC Ltd.
236 Taxmann 612 · 2016 · High Court
108
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 80IA, specifically for inter-unit transfer of power, the benefit cannot be claimed based on rates chargeable by distribution licensees to consumers. The deduction must be computed based on the rate fixed by the Tariff Regulation Commission for sale by electricity generating companies.

Dhanuka & Sons. v. CIT
339 ITR 319 · 2011 · High Court
100
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A for expenditure incurred to earn exempt dividend income (under Section 10(34)) is permissible. The assessee bears the burden to show the source of funds for acquiring shares, regardless of whether those shares are old or recently acquired.

Velu Palandar v. DCIT
83 ITR 683 · 1972 · High Court
94
citing judgments

The opportunity of hearing provided to an assessee must be real, effective, and realistic, not merely notional, and tax authorities are incumbent to decide cases on their merits after affording due opportunity.

CIT v. Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd.
372 ITR 303 · 2015 · High Court
93
citing judgments

An assessment order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue merely because it does not explicitly discuss an issue for which the Assessing Officer had raised queries and the assessee had provided a response. In such a scenario, the Principal Commissioner cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263.

JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT
130 Taxmann.com 118 · 2021 · ITAT
93
citing judgments

Donations made as part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure are eligible for deduction under Section 80G if all conditions of Section 80G are satisfied. Such expenses are not automatically disallowed merely because they are CSR expenditure, in the absence of specific amendments to Section 80G similar to those in Section 37(1).

Judgments on Section 80G

Divya Shakti Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT/Comm of Income Tax, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2167/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Oct 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2167/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Divya Shakti Charitable बिधम/ Pcit Or Cit Trust Mumbai. Vs. A-19, Maharaja Surajmal, 4- Bungalows, Andheri West, Mumbai-400053. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatd3251A (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri T. Sankar (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Approval U/S 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”). However, Since The Grant Of Approval Was Made Subject To Several Conditions Imposed In Form No. 10Ac While Granting Registration Under Clause (Iii) Of Section Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act, The Assessee Being Aggrieved Has Preferred This Appeal Challenging The Action Of Ld. Cit(E) Stipulating Conditions While Granting Registration U/S 80G Of The Act. 2. It Is Admitted Fact That The Assessee Is Registered U/S 12A Of The Act & Further It Is Noted That Similar Issue Has Cropped Up (I.E. Cit(E) Had Prescribed Similar Conditions While Granting Approval U/S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri T. Sankar (Sr. AR)
Section 10Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Divya Shakti Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT Or Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2166/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Oct 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2166/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Divya Shakti Charitable बिधम/ Pcit Or Cit Trust Mumbai. Vs. A-19, Maharaja Surajmal, 4- Bungalows, Andheri West, Mumbai-400053. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatd3251A (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri T. Sankar (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Approval U/S 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”). However, Since The Grant Of Approval Was Made Subject To Several Conditions Imposed In Form No. 10Ac While Granting Registration Under Clause (Iii) Of Section Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act, The Assessee Being Aggrieved Has Preferred This Appeal Challenging The Action Of Ld. Cit(E) Stipulating Conditions While Granting Registration U/S 80G Of The Act. 2. It Is Admitted Fact That The Assessee Is Registered U/S 12A Of The Act & Further It Is Noted That Similar Issue Has Cropped Up (I.E. Cit(E) Had Prescribed Similar Conditions While Granting Approval U/S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri T. Sankar (Sr. AR)
Section 10Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

M/S. Vallabhbhai Dhanjibhai & Co., Bhavnagar vs. The ACIT., Circle-1, Bhavnagar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2725/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S.Vallabhbhai Dhanjibhai & Co. The Acit T, 7/8, Darshan Complex V Circle-1 Nr.Madhav Complex S Bhavnagar Nilambaug, Bhavnagar – 364 003 Pan:Aacfv 2572 J अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Biren Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rakesh Jha, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 19/10/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19/10/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Pramod M. Jagtapthis Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-6, Ahmedabad [Cit(A)] Dated 19Th September, 2017 & The Grounds Raised Therein Read As Under: 1. The Honorable Cit(A)-6, Ahmedabad Failed To Appreciate The Facts Of The Case & Denied 50% Deduction U/S.80G Of The Act On The Addition Made On Account Of Disallowance Of Donation Expenses Of Rs.454879* Made By Assessing Officer. 2. The Honorable Cit(A)-6, Ahmedabad Failed To Appreciate The Facts Of The Case & Confirmed The Addition Partly [Depreciation Allowed] Of Disallowance On Account Of Fixed Assets Rico Tools Of Rs.2126564** Vallabhbhai Dhanjibhai & Co., Bhavnagar Vs. Acit Ay 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Biren Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Jha, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 80G

Sri Shirdi Sai Baba Satsang Seva Charitable Trust, Bhilai vs. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption, Bhopal

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 201/RPR/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.201/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :Na) Sri Shirdi Sai Baba Satsang Seva Vs Cit(Exemption), Bhopal Charitable Trust, Plot No.98, Pragati Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, Dist : Durgq Pan No. : Aaits 4066 J (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.Kmishra, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(E), Bhopal, Dated 30.09.2019. 2. The Sole Ground Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Is Against The Action Of The Cit(E) In Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Filed For Exemption U/S.80G Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Trust Filed An Application Seeking Approval U/S.80G Of The Act In Form No.10G On 08.03.2019. The Cit(E) Rejected The Application Of The Assessee Holding That The Genuineness Of The Activities Of The Assessee Could Not Verified. 4. Against The Rejection Of Application Of The Assessee For Approval U/S.80G Of The Act By The Cit(E), The Assessee Is Now In Appeal Before The Tribunal.

For Appellant: Shri R.B.Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.KMishra, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)