Section 80C of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.123

Section 80C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 123 (Deduction for life insurance premia, deferred annuity, contributions to provident fund, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 123 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80C is Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Delco India Pvt. Ltd. (67 Taxmann.com 357), cited in 42 of the 658 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80C

Judgments on Section 80C

Madan Lal Jat, Jaipur vs. ITO Ward 7(1), Jaipur

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 1883/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Jun 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Guptamadan Lal Jat Vs. Ito Nitharwalo Ki Dhani, Ward 7(1) Mundli Renwal Jaipur Raj. Jaipur 303603 (Present Address C/O G.S. Stonex, 3/185- Bachamanglam Ring Road Semanur Village Bagur Krishnagiri Tamil Nadu 635108, Jaipur "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No:Bdqpj 0380 Q Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, Adv. Respondent By : Mrs. Aarti Rawat, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing 23.06.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 30.06.2026 O R D E R The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Nfac) (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ld. Cit(A)”), Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Dated 31- 10-25. P A G E | 2 Madan Lal Jat 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Read As Under:- 1. The Impugned Order U/S 147 Rws 144 Of The I. T. Act, 1961 Dated 24.03.2022 As Well As The Notice U/S 147 Rws 144 & Action Or Proceedings U/S 147/144 Are Illegal, Bad In Law, Barred By Limitation, Without Jurisdiction, Without Approval/Satisfaction From The Proper Or Competent Authority, In Valid Exparty Order In Gross Breach Of The Law & Against The Principle Of Natural Justice & Various Other Reasons Or & Further Contrary To The Real Facts Of The Case Hence The Same May Kindly Be Quashed.

For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Aarti Rawat, Addl. CIT
Section 147Section 234ASection 250Section 44ASection 68Section 80C