Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.93

Section 57(iii) falls under section 57 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 93 (Deductions) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 93 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 57(iii) is CIT v. Rajendra Prasad Moody (115 ITR 519), cited in 386 of the 716 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 57(iii)

CIT v. Rajendra Prasad Moody
115 ITR 519 · 1978 · Supreme Court
386
citing judgments

For deductions under Section 57(iii) relating to "Income from Other Sources," an expenditure is allowable if it is laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of making or earning such income, even if no income is actually earned in that previous year.

Shambhu Investment (P) Ltd. v. CIT
263 ITR 143 · 2003 · Supreme Court
181
citing judgments

Income derived from letting out property along with incidental use of furniture, fixtures, and common facilities is assessable as 'income from house property' and not 'business income' when the prime object is merely to let out and not to exploit the property as a business asset.

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
58 Taxmann.com 35 · 2015 · High Court
114
citing judgments

When a co-operative society earns interest on deposits with scheduled banks, this income is assessable under "Income from other sources" (Section 56), and the society is entitled to deduct related administrative and proportionate expenses under Section 57 to tax only the net interest income.

Chelmsford Club v. CIT
243 ITR 89 · 2000 · Supreme Court
100
citing judgments

Income arising from mutual activities carried out by clubs or associations solely among their members is not assessable for income tax, as it does not constitute income from a trade or business due to the principle of mutuality.

CIT v. V.P. Gopinathan
248 ITR 449 · 2001 · Supreme Court
66
citing judgments

Interest paid on a loan taken against the security of a fixed deposit cannot be set off against or reduced from the interest income earned on that fixed deposit. The Income-tax Act does not permit such netting.

Punjab Stainless Steel Inds v. CIT
324 ITR 396 · 2010 · High Court
66
citing judgments

This case establishes that merely having sufficient interest-free own funds does not automatically prevent interest disallowance on interest-free advances; the assessee must affirmatively prove the business or commercial expediency of such advances.

79 Taxman 378/216 ITR 548 (Bom.) 4. CIT v. Macbrout Engineering (P.) Ltd.
52 Taxmann.com 219 · 2014 · High Court
43
citing judgments

If the Revenue accepts the Tribunal's decision for earlier years without challenge, it cannot assail the same decision in subsequent years, provided the facts are similar.

CIT v. Amritaben R. Shah
238 ITR 777 · 1999 · High Court
37
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred to acquire controlling interest in a company, rather than to earn dividend income, is not allowable as a deduction under section 57(iii) as it is in the nature of capital expenditure.

BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. PCIT
399 ITR 228 · 2017 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Revision under Section 263 is justified when the Assessing Officer fails to consider a significant portion of a claim, such as depreciation, leading to an erroneous assessment that is prejudicial to the revenue.

CIT v. Rampur Timber & Turnery Co. Ltd.
129 ITR 58 · 1981 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning income is deductible under Section 57(iii) even if no income is actually earned. The earning of income is not a pre-condition for allowing the deduction.

Judgments on Section 57(iii)

Gitanjali Infratech Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cen Cir 2, Mumbai

ITA 1366/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Sh.Rajendra & C. N. Prasadआयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./1366/Mum/2016,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Ay.: 2008-09 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./3486/Mum/2016,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Ay.: 2010-11 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./3487/Mum/2016,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Ay.: 2011-12 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S. Gitanjali Infratech Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-1(2), A-1, 7Th Floor, Laxmi Tower, G Block 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Building, Mk Road Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East Vs. Mumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 051. Pan:Aaccg 7677 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By: Shri Y.K. Bhaskar-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से /Assessee By: Shri K. Gopal/Ms.Neha Paranjpe सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 15/11/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 07/02/2018 लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य, राजे"" सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार/ Per Rajendra A.M.- अनुसार Challenging The Order Dated 28/4/2016 Of The Cit(A)- 47,Mumbai,The Assessee Has Filed Present Appeals For The Above Mentioned Ay.S (Ay.S) .The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Construction Of Residential/Commercial Buildings.Details Of Filing Of Returns, Returned Incomes,Assessment Dates Etc., Can Be Summarised As Under: A.Y. Roi Filed On Returned Income Assessment Dt. Assessed Income 2008-09 3.12.2013 Rs.6,41,16,960/- 20/03/2014 Rs.6.46 Crores 2010-11 30/11/12 Rs.75,91,149/- 20/03/2014 Rs.7.77 Lakhs 2011-12 30/11/2012 Rs.31,54,224/- 20/03/2014 Rs.17.68 Lakhs

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopal/Ms.Neha ParanjpeFor Respondent: Shri Y.K. Bhaskar-DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153CSection 57

Marriott Properties & Deveopers P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT 10(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 3085/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahyaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3085/Mum/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Marriott Properties & Dcit-10(2)(2), Developers Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai बनाम/ 108, 7 Bungalow, Shivam Apartments, Vs. J. P. Road, Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 053 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aafcm 8465 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : None ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. N. Hemalatha सुनवाई क" तार"ख / : 11.10.2017 Date Of Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख / : 01.01.2018 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Shamim Yahya, A. M.: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Dated 09.2.2017 & Pertains To The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Read As Under: 1. The Learned Cit(Appeals) Erred In Upholding Assessing Officer’S View Of Disallowing Director’S Remuneration Of Rs.10,00,000/- Debited To Profit & Loss Account Without Any Valid Findings & Reasoning Only On Personal Notions & Surmises.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. N. Hemalatha
Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 57

ITO, WD-12(2), Kolkata vs. Sudhir Satnaliwala, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 452/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 452/Kol/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Ito Ward 12(2), Kolkata..............................…………………………………………Appellant Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700069 Sudhir Satnaniwala……………………………………………….............................Respondent 10, Raja Santosh Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700 027 [Pan : Ajvps2252C] Appearances By: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Dr), Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Shri M. Satnaliwala, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 10, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 30 , 2017 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Am This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit (Appeals) – 12, Kolkata Dated 04.12.2013. 2. In Ground No 1, The Revenue Has Challenged The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) In Deleting The Disallowance Of Rs. 25,74,066/- Made By The A.O. On Account Of Demand For Outstanding Municipal Taxes. 3. The Assessee In The Present Case Is An Individual Who Inter Alia Is Engaged In The Business Of Running Guest House In The Name Of His Proprietary Concern, M/S. Check-In Check-Out. The Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration Was Filed By Him On 23.09.2009 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs. 32,18,292/-. In The Profit & Loss Filed

Section 57