SHRI PRANAY V. SHAH,.,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), BHAVNAGAR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is in the finance business and has demonstrated a direct link between the interest income earned and the interest paid on borrowed funds. Therefore, the conditions of Section 57(iii) are satisfied.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 9,49,494/- as interest expenses on loans, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The assessee argued that it is in the finance business and the borrowed funds were advanced to parties, creating a nexus between interest paid and interest earned.
What were the issues?
Whether interest paid on borrowed funds can be allowed as a deduction when the assessee is in the finance business and the funds were advanced to parties, creating a nexus between interest earned and paid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI S. S. GODARA
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This appeal by the Assessee is preferred against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad dated 23.09.2015 pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13.
ITA No. 18/Ahd/2016 2 . A.Y. 2012-13 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs. 9,49,494/-.
The assessee filed its return electronically on 24.12.2012 declaring total income at Rs. 5,60,720/-. The return was selected for scrutiny assessment and accordingly statutory notices were issued and served upon the assessee.
During the course of the scrutiny assessment proceedings, the A.O. noticed that the assessee has claimed deduction of Rs. 9,49,494/- on account of interest expenses on loans. The A.O. found that the same has been claimed as deduction from the income shown under the head “income from other sources”. The A.O. was of the opinion that the provision of Section 57(iii) of the Act allows deduction only when the purpose is relatable to the activity of the assessee in earning such income. The A.O. found that there was no direct nexus between the amounts of interest received and interest paid and, therefore, form a belief that the same cannot b allowed as deduction.
The A.O. asked the assessee to justify its claim of deduction of interest expenses of Rs. 9,49,494/-. Assessee filed a detailed reply stating that it is in the business of finance and therefore the money borrowed were advanced to various parties and on the borrowed funds, the assessee had paid interest whereas on the money advanced to various parties, the assessee has earned interest. The assessee claimed that there is a direct nexus between the interest earned and interest paid and therefore the deduction is to be allowed.
The reply field by the assessee did not find any favour with the A.O. who proceeded by disallowing the expenses of Rs. 9,49,494/-.
ITA No. 18/Ahd/2016 3 . A.Y. 2012-13 7. Assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) but without any success.
Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee reiterated what has been stated before the lower authorities. Per contra, the ld. D.R. strongly supported the findings of the A.O.
We have given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below. The undisputed fact is that the assessee is in the business of finance and therefore in pursuance of its business activities, the assessee has borrowed funds and has advanced the same to various parties. In the computation of income under the head “income from other sources”, the assessee has shown income of Rs. 6,53,773/-. We find that the assessee has shown interest earned on loans and advances at Rs. 15,91,426/-. We further find that the assessee has paid interest on loans at Rs. 9,49,494/-. These facts are as exhibited on page 42 of the paper book. We find that in earning the interest income of Rs. 15.91 lacs, the assessee has paid interest of Rs. 9.49 lacs. Exhibit 42 clearly shows the link between earning interest income and the payment of interest. In our considered opinion, the assessee satisfies the conditions laid down in Section 57(iii) of the Act and is therefore eligible for the claim of deduction of interest. We accordingly direct the A.O. to allow the claim of deduction of interest of Rs. 9,49,494/-. Appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 17 - 11- 2017
Sd/- Sd/- (S. S. GODARA) (N. K. BILLAIYA) JUDICIAL MEMBER True Copy ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 17 /11/2017
More judgments on Section 57(iii)
- Raghuraj Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs DCIT-ACIT Cirle Silchar/DCIT Circle 1…ITA 143/GTY/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Nagini Cooperative Credit Society Limited… vs ITO, Ward 6(2)(1), Bangalore, BengaluruITA 619/BANG/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3412/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3411/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3410/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026