Section 56(1) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.92

Section 56(1) falls under section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 92 (Income from other sources) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 92 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 56(1) is Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona (89 Taxmann.com 127), cited in 130 of the 131 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 56(1)

Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona
89 Taxmann.com 127 · 2018 · Supreme Court
130
citing judgments

The claim of depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act for assets used by charitable trusts is permissible, affirming the Bombay High Court's view that such a claim does not amount to a 'double benefit'.

CIT v. Nirbheram Deluram
91 Taxmann 181 · 1997 · Supreme Court
35
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) can make enhancements to an assessment during appellate proceedings, provided such enhancements do not amount to introducing an entirely new head of income.

DIT v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission
262 CTR 558 · 2013 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable on capital assets for charitable trusts even if expenditure was allowed as deduction, as long as it doesn't amount to double deduction. The principles of commercial accountancy apply when computing business income.

Mahimananda Mishra v. ACIT
343 ITR 350 · 2012 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) is taxable in the hands of an individual shareholder, not in the hands of a firm in which the shareholder is a partner, if the firm itself is not a shareholder in the lending company.

CIT v. Nirbheram Deluram
297 ITR 72 · 2008 · High Court
7
citing judgments
CIT v. Allahabad Bank Ltd.
73 ITR 745 · 1969 · Supreme Court
7
citing judgments
Commissioner of 563, Bhopal Fire & General Insurance Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax
53 ITR 108 · 1964 · Supreme Court
5
citing judgments
CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry
251 ITR 868 · 2001 · High Court
4
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 56(1)

Instant Holdings Ltd, Mumbai vs. Pr CIT 6, Thane

ITA 2433/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Dec 2015AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sandeep Gosaini.T.A. No.2433/M/2015 (Assessment Year: 2011-2012) फनाभ/ Instant Holdings Ltd., Pr. Commissioner Of Income (Successor To M/S. Idea Tax-6, Vs. Tracom (P) Ltd), Mumbai. 213, Bezzola Complex, „B‟ Wing, 71 – Sion Trombay Road, Chembur, Mumbai – 400 071. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aacfn0055A (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant By : Shri Vijay Mehta प्रत्मथी की ओय से/ Respondent By : Shri Sambit Mishra, Dr सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 07.10.2015 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 07.12.2015 आदेश / O R D E R Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee On 28.4.2015 Is Against The Revision Order Of The Cit-6, Mumbai Dated 17.3.2015 For The Ay 2011-12. 2. In This Appeal, Though The Assessee Raised Three Grounds In Toto, The Legal Ground That Emanates From The Appeal Relates To The Validity Of The Order Of Principal Cit (Hereinafter Referred As Cit) In Assuming The Jurisdiction U/S 263 Of The Act On Various Reasons. Briefly Stated Relevant Facts In This Regard Are That The Assessee- Company (Idea Tracom P Ltd) Was Formed On 22.5.2010 By Shri Kheman Yadav & Shri Yash Agarwal. The Ownership Of This Company Was Transferred From The Above Said Persons To M/S. Rpg Cellular Investment & Holdings Pvt Ltd (Rpg Cellular) & M/S. South Asia Electricity Holdings Ltd (South Asia). On 11.8.2010, The Rpg Cellular & South Asia Transferred Their Shares To M/S. Universal Industrial Funds Ltd (Universal). Thus, The Said Assessee-Company Has Become The 100% Subsidiary Of The „Universal‟. The Assessee Purchased 1,67,350 Shares Of Kec International Ltd

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Sambit Mishra, DR
Section 142Section 263Section 56(1)