Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.61

Section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 61 (Special provision for computation of income on presumptive basis in respect of certain business activities of certain non-residents) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 61 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 44BB is ONGC v. CIT (376 ITR 306), cited in 241 of the 388 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 44BB

ONGC v. CIT
376 ITR 306 · 2015 · Supreme Court
241
citing judgments

Income derived by a non-resident for services related to mineral oil operations, falling under the presumptive taxation regime of Section 44BB, cannot simultaneously be treated as fees for technical services under Section 9(1)(vii). The specific presumptive provisions override the general FTS definition, particularly when DTAA applies.

CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd.
380 ITR 130 · 2016 · High Court
84
citing judgments

For computing presumptive income under Section 44BB, gross receipts do not include service tax reimbursements received from a client (like ONGC) if such amounts are not payments for services or plant/machinery directly used in the prospecting, extraction, or production of mineral oils.

DIT v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd.
414 ITR 1 · 2019 · High Court
82
citing judgments

Service tax paid to the Government of India is not 'on account of' the provision of services for mineral oil exploration and production, and thus does not form part of the aggregate taxable amount under Section 44BB(2)(a) and (b).

UCB India (P) Limited v. ACIT
121 ITD 131 · 2009 · ITAT
70
citing judgments

For transfer pricing purposes, distinct international transactions, such as royalty payments and manufacturing, should be benchmarked separately rather than aggregated. The selection of comparables must be based on a thorough Functions, Assets, and Risks (FAR) analysis, and loss-making entities are not automatically excluded if they satisfy other comparability criteria.

CIT v. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc.
300 ITR 265 · 2008 · High Court
50
citing judgments

For computing profits under the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44BB, gross revenue excludes service tax collected and deposited by the assessee but includes mobilization/demobilization fees for offshore services.

DIT v. Galileo International Inc.
224 CTR 251 · High Court
37
citing judgments

If the income attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India is less than the remuneration paid to a dependent agent, the assessment is extinguished and no further computation of income is required.

Sedco Forex International Inc. v. CIT
399 ITR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
29
citing judgments

Section 44BB, which provides for presumptive taxation of profits and gains of business in the case of exploration of mineral oils, does not override the provisions of Sections 5, 9, or 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For business profits to be taxed in India, the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India must be established by the Revenue.

44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.
62 Taxmann.com 24 · 2015 · High Court
21
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing presumptive income under Section 44BB(2), 'gross receipts' do not include service tax collected by the assessee and paid to the government, as it does not represent an amount paid to the assessee for services rendered in connection with mineral oil extraction.

Production Testing Services Inc. v. DCIT
68 Taxmann.com 143 · 2016 · High Court
7
citing judgments
Technip UK Ltd. v. DIT (International Tax)
74 Taxmann.com 248 · 2016 · High Court
7
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 44BB

Maritime Vanguard Pte Ltd., Mumbai vs. DCIT (International Taxation) -3(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5999/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Vp & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.5999/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Maritime Vanguard Pvt. Ltd. बिधम/ Dcit (International C/O Srbc & Associates, Taxation)-3(2)(1) Vs. Llp, 14Th Floor, The Ruby, Room No.1615, 16Th Floor, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Air India Building, Nariman Dadar (W), Mumbai-400028. Point, Mumbai-400021. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aajcm3609F (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri M. P. Lohia (Ar) Revenue By: Shri Sanjay Singh (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 06/02/2020 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Assessment Order Passed U/S.144C(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ( In Short “The Act”) In Pursuance Of The Directions Of Dispute Resolution Panel – 3, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Drp”] Dated 27.06.2019 Relevant To The A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: - “General 1. Erred In Assessing Total Income At Rs39,66,00,300 As Against Returned Income Of Rs Nil; Taxability Under The Income Tax Act. 1961 ('Act) A.Y.2016-17

For Appellant: Shri M. P. Lohia (AR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Singh (DR)
Section 143(2)Section 144C(1)Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 44BSection 9Section 9(1)(vi)

DCIT(International Taxation)-3(3)(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. Nabors Drilling International Limited, Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1215/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Nabors Drilling Income Tax, (International Internationallimited Taxation)-3(3)(1) C/O. Nangia & Co Ca’S R.No.1630, 16Th Floor 1101, Tower-B, Peninsula Air India Building, Business Park, Ganpat Rao Nariman Point, Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Mumbai – 400 021 Mumbai - 400013 Pan/Gir No.Aadcn7265N (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Jet Drilling(S) Pte.Ltd 1St Floor, Ajanta Executive Income Tax, (International Taxation)-3(3)(1) Centre, 8, Juhu Tara Road R.No.1630, 16Th Floor Juhu, Mumbai-400 064 Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan/Gir No.Aabcj9895N (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Novodrill Limited Income Tax, (International C/O. Nangia & Co. Ca’S Taxation)-3(3)(1) 1101, Tower-B, Peninsula R.No.1630, 16Th Floor Business Park, Ganpat Rao Air India Building, Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 013 Mumbai – 400 021 Pan/Gir No.Aadcn0630M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals In Ita Nos. 1215/Mum/2019, 1216/Mum/2019, 1321/Mum/2019 & 1214/Mum/2019 For A.Yrs.2014-15 & 2015-16 Arise Out Of The Order By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-57, Mumbai In Appeal Dated 27/12/2018, 28/12/2018 & 20/12/2018 Respectively (Ld. Cit(A) In Short) Against The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C(3) & 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Respectively (Hereinafter Referred To As Act) Dated, 27/12/2016 27/12/2017, 08/02/2017 & 29/12/2016 Respectively By The Ld. Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax(It)-3(3)(1), Mumbai (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. Ao).

Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 44B

Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd, Mumbai vs. Dy. C.I.T. (International Taxation) - 4(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7415/MUM/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 7414/Mum/2017 (यिर्ाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2014-15) Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited Dy. Commissioner Of 4Th Floor, Chemtex House, Main Income Tax, (International Street, Hiranandani Gardens, बनाम/ Taxation)-4(2)(1), Powai, Mumbai-400706, 17Th Floor, Air India Vs. Maharashtra Building, Mumbai-400 021 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aascs2719P आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 7415/Mum/2017 (यिर्ाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2014-15) Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Dy. Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, (International 4Th Floor, Chemtex House, Main Taxation)-4(2)(1), बनाम/ Street, Hiranandani Gardens, 17Th Floor, Air India Vs. Powai, Mumbai-400706, Building, Mumbai-400 021 Maharashtra (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aascs2715B अपीलार्थी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Ar प्रत्यर्थी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri A Mohan, Dr

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, ARFor Respondent: Shri A Mohan, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(13)Section 446BSection 44B

Shelf Drilling J. T. Angel Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy. C.I.T. (International Taxation) - 4(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7414/MUM/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 7414/Mum/2017 (यिर्ाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2014-15) Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited Dy. Commissioner Of 4Th Floor, Chemtex House, Main Income Tax, (International Street, Hiranandani Gardens, बनाम/ Taxation)-4(2)(1), Powai, Mumbai-400706, 17Th Floor, Air India Vs. Maharashtra Building, Mumbai-400 021 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aascs2719P आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 7415/Mum/2017 (यिर्ाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2014-15) Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Dy. Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, (International 4Th Floor, Chemtex House, Main Taxation)-4(2)(1), बनाम/ Street, Hiranandani Gardens, 17Th Floor, Air India Vs. Powai, Mumbai-400706, Building, Mumbai-400 021 Maharashtra (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aascs2715B अपीलार्थी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri J D Mistry, Ar प्रत्यर्थी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri A Mohan, Dr

For Appellant: Shri J D Mistry, ARFor Respondent: Shri A Mohan, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(13)Section 446BSection 44B