Section 36(1)(viia)(c) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.29, 30, 31, 32

Section 36(1)(viia)(c) falls under section 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 29 (Deductions related to employee welfare), section 30 (Deduction on certain premium), section 31 (Deduction for bad debt and provision for bad and doubtful debt) and section 32 (Other deductions) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 29 of the 2025 ActRead section 30 of the 2025 ActRead section 31 of the 2025 ActRead section 32 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 36(1)(viia)(c) is Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. Addl.CIT (396 ITR 667), cited in 20 of the 53 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 36(1)(viia)(c)

Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. v. Addl.CIT
396 ITR 667 · 2017 · High Court
20
citing judgments

A provision made by a public sector unit for the revision of employee pay, based on a government-appointed committee's recommendations, is an allowable business expenditure.

Kanhaiyalal Dudheriya v. JCIT
418 ITR 410 · 2019 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred towards constructing facilities for obtaining permits and licenses is a prudent business decision and constitutes a revenue expenditure deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, especially when the assessee's business involves dealing with government authorities.

Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. (REC) v. Addl. CIT
34 SOT 159 · 2009 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

Deductions under sections 36(1)(viia)(c) and 36(1)(viii) are to be allowed as per the scheme laid down by the ITAT. The issue of allowing these deductions is highly debatable and beyond the scope of rectification under section 154.

Karnataka Forest Plantations Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT
156 ITR 275 · 1985 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds cannot be considered an expense incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning income if the borrowed funds are deposited for short periods and earn interest. The interest income from such deposits is incidental and independent of the borrowings.

PCIT v. PEC Ltd.
451 ITR 136 · High Court
9
citing judgments
Gujarat Toll Road Investment Co. Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
125 ITD 159 · ITAT
3
citing judgments
Lakshmi Villas Bank Ltd. v. CIT
154 Taxmann 301 · Reported
3
citing judgments
Dy CIT v. Gujarat Road and Infrastructure Co. Ltd.
31 Taxmann.com 137 · 2013 · Reported
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 36(1)(viia)(c)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Circle 1 1, Chennai vs. Capital First Limited(Merged With Idfc First Bank Limited), Chennai

In the result, both the appeal filed by the Revenue and the Cross

ITA 1692/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1692/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 & C.O. No. 63/Chny/2024 [In I.T.A. No. 1692/Chny/2024] The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Capital First Limited (Merged With Income Tax, Idfc Bank Limited), Kpm Tower, 7Th Floor, No. 1, Harrington Road, Corporate Circle 11, Chennai. Chetpet, Chennai 600 031. [Pan:Aacck6863C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) Department By : Shri M. Rajan, Cit Assessee By : Shri Ketan K. Ved, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.10.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.10.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 14.03.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Since, The Issues Raised In The Revenue’S Appeal & The Cross Objections Of The Assessee Are Similar & Based On The Same Identical Facts, With The Consent Of Both The Parties, We Proceed To Hear The Appeal

For Appellant: Shri Ketan K. Ved, C.AFor Respondent: Shri M. Rajan, CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148