Section 35A of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 35A is CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd. (315 ITR 114), cited in 48 of the 29 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 35A
CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.
315 ITR 114 · 2009 · Supreme Court
48
citing judgments
Expenditure qualifies as 'current repairs' if it maintains existing machinery without replacement, creates no new asset, restores functional efficiency without increasing capacity, and is not an independent unit. Conversely, the cost of replacing machinery, especially independent units, constitutes capital expenditure.
CIT v. Ramaraji Surgical Cotton Mills
294 ITR 328 · 2007 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments
The High Court's direction to the CIT(Appeals) to consider specific Supreme Court judgments implies that cases may be decided on merits by appellate authorities based on relevant precedents without necessarily remanding them to the Assessing Officer.
Udaipur Distillery Co. Ltd. v. CIT
314 ITR 188 · 2009 · Supreme Court
5
citing judgments