Section 275(1) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.472

Section 275(1) falls under section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 472 (Bar of limitation for imposing penalties) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 472 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

33 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 275(1).

Judgments on Section 275(1)

Century Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Vadodara vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department Present Jurisdiction the DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara

ITA 867/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं / Ita No. 867/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 Century Pharmaceuticals Ltd., बनाम Assessment Unit, 406, World Trade Centre, Income Tax Department Vs. Sayajigunj, Vadodara Represented Through Gujarat-390005 Dcit, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda Pan: Aaacc 7646 K अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Shri M.J. Shah & Shri Rushin Patel, Ars िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Hrishikesh Hemant Patki, Sr Dr ""थ" की ओर से / Revenue By: सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24/07/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/07/2024 आदेश/O R D E R The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [In Short Referred To As “Ld. Cit(A)”] Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short Referred To As “The Act”] Dated 26.02.2024, Confirming The Levy Of Penalty Of Rs.1,50,000/- U/S 271B Of The Act, For Delayed Furnishing Of Tax Audit Report As Required U/S 44Ab Of The Act, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are Descriptive & Argumentative In Nature. I Am, Therefore, Reproducing Only The Highlighted Portion Of The Grounds Of Appeal Which Are As Follows:- “1. On The Facts & On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of Your Appellant’S Case & In Law, The Honorable Cit-Appeals (Nfac) Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ld. Ao Of Invoking Provision Of Section 271B, In Our Case After The Six Years By Violating The Provision Of The Section 275(1) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Hrishikesh Hemant Patki, Sr DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271BSection 275(1)Section 44A

Shri. S Nachimuthu (HUF), Namakkal vs. ITO Ward 2, Namakkal

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1769/CHNY/2018[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2019AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1768/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2000-01 Sri S. Natchimuthu (Individual), The Income Tax Officer, Ganapathypalayam, Oruvandur Post, Vs. Ward – 2, Namakkal. Namakkal. [Pan:Aajpn4513A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1769/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2000-01 Sri S. Natchimuthu (Huf), Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ganapathypalayam, Oruvandur Post, Ward – 2, Namakkal. Namakkal. [Pan:Aanhs2153P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G.N. Ragavendra Rao, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem, Dated 08.02.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13 Passed Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G.N. Ragavendra Rao, JCIT
Section 133ASection 144Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)

Sri. S Nachimuthu, Namakkal vs. ITO Ward 2, Namakkal

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1768/CHNY/2018[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Sept 2019AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1768/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2000-01 Sri S. Natchimuthu (Individual), The Income Tax Officer, Ganapathypalayam, Oruvandur Post, Vs. Ward – 2, Namakkal. Namakkal. [Pan:Aajpn4513A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1769/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2000-01 Sri S. Natchimuthu (Huf), Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ganapathypalayam, Oruvandur Post, Ward – 2, Namakkal. Namakkal. [Pan:Aanhs2153P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G.N. Ragavendra Rao, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.09.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem, Dated 08.02.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13 Passed Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G.N. Ragavendra Rao, JCIT
Section 133ASection 144Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)