G B LAWNS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2017-18 involved additions to rental income and booking advances. For AY 2018-19, the appeal concerned a penalty levied under Section 271AAC(1) related to an addition under Section 68, which was challenged in a writ petition.
What did the Tribunal hold?
For AY 2017-18, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting some disallowances. For AY 2018-19, the Tribunal deleted the penalty under Section 271AAC(1) as the underlying addition was under challenge in a pending writ petition.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of assessment proceedings, the correctness of additions made to income, and the levy of penalty when the underlying assessment was under challenge.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 271AAC(1),Section 68,Section 36(1)(vii),Section 36(2),Section 41(1),Section 147,Section 144B,Section 115BBE,Section 275(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: These two separate appeals are filed by the assessee against the two separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24 dated 25.09.2025 and 24.09.2025 in Appeal Nos. CIT(A), Lucknow-1/10846/2019-20 and Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi-24/10386/2017-18 arising out of order passed u/s 143(3) dated 28.12.2019 and 271AAC(1) of the Act dated 29.09.2023 for Assessment Year 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively.
As both the appeals are related to one assessee, therefore, they are disposed off by a common order.
First we taken up the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.7639/Del/2025 for Ass
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271AAC(1)
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026