Section 244A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.437

Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 437 (Interest on refunds) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 437 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 244A is ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd. (117 ITD 169), cited in 151 of the 1,186 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 244A

ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.
117 ITD 169 · 2009 · ITAT
151
citing judgments
Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT
195 ITR 682 · 1992 · High Court
131
citing judgments

Club membership fees, including both entrance fees and annual subscriptions, are not considered capital expenditure if the membership's continuance depends on regular payments, and therefore are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1).

CIT v. Karnataka Power Corporation
247 ITR 268 · 2001 · Supreme Court
124
citing judgments

Income earned during the project construction stage, which has a direct nexus or is inextricably linked to the project's setting up, constitutes a capital receipt not liable to tax and reduces the project cost.

Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT
382 ITR 179 · 2016 · High Court
122
citing judgments

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowable even if no tax is paid in India on the corresponding income due to deductions under sections 10A or 10AA, or losses in other units. The scope of income eligible for deduction under Section 10AA includes interest on deposits and realized gains on forward contracts.

DDIT v. Savvis Communication Corporation
69 Taxmann.com 106 · 2016 · ITAT
107
citing judgments

Payments for web hosting services, including data back-up, maintenance, security, and uninterrupted services, are not taxable as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, as they do not constitute 'consideration for use of, or right to use, scientific equipment'.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT, Range10(2), Mumbai
234 CTR 1 · 2010 · High Court
97
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee in relation to income not forming part of the total income is not deductible under Section 14A(1). The disallowance must be restricted to direct and indirect expenses having an approximate connection with the earning of such exempt income, and Rule 8D applies from Assessment Year 2008-09.

Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT
280 ITR 643 · 2006 · Supreme Court
96
citing judgments

Assessees are entitled to compensation for the inordinate delay by the Income Tax Department in refunding excess tax, which includes interest on the statutory interest due under section 244A for such delayed refunds.

Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
363 ITR 658 · 2014 · Supreme Court
91
citing judgments

The Department has a moral and legal obligation to refund excess tax collected from taxpayers, along with interest. An assessee is entitled to interest on the amount of taxes refunded, including interest on interest, as per Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Dinesh Kumar Goel
331 ITR 10 · 2011 · High Court
87
citing judgments

Income is recognized when it is absolutely ascertained, determined, and specified, conferring an exclusive right of receipt upon the assessee, irrespective of the accounting period.

Sunil Siddharthbhai v. CIT
156 ITR 509 · 1985 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

A partner's contribution of a personal asset to a partnership firm does not amount to a "transfer" for capital gains purposes under the Income-tax Act, as the consideration (the partner's interest in the firm) is indeterminate, and the computational machinery for capital gains fails.

Judgments on Section 244A

S.R. Batliboi & Co. LLP, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Circle - 22, Kolkata

In the result, for statistical purpose, the appeal of assessee is 11

ITA 264/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Nov 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year:2006-07 S.R Batliboi & Commission. Llp Dy. Commissioner बनाम / (A Limited Liability Partnership With Of Income Tax, V/S. Llp Identity No. Aab-4294) Circle-22, Kolkata Successor To S.R. Batliboi & Commission. A Partnership Firm Effective 1St April 2013) 22, Camac Street, Kokata-16 [Pan No.Achfs 9180 N] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Debobrate Ghosh, Fca अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Arindama Bhattacharjee, Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 04-10-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 08 -11-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Kolkata Dated 31.12.2015. Assessment Was Framed By Acit, Circle-54, Kolkata U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 06.08.2013 For Assessment Year 2006-07. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Per Its Appeal Are As Under:- “1. The Learned Commission Of Income Tax (Appeals)-6 [“Cit(A)” For Short]Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Treating The Sum Of Rs.3,20,046 Granted As Interest U/S/. 244A & Included In The Amount Refunded On 28-7-2011 As Refund Out Of Taxes Paid; 2. The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred On Facts & In La In Not Directing The Learned Ao To Compute Interest Allowable Under Section 244A In Accordance With The Express

Section 154Section 244ASection 244A(3)Section 251