Section 244A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.437

Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 437 (Interest on refunds) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 437 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 244A is ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd. (117 ITD 169), cited in 151 of the 1,186 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 244A

ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.
117 ITD 169 · 2009 · ITAT
151
citing judgments
Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT
195 ITR 682 · 1992 · High Court
131
citing judgments

Club membership fees, including both entrance fees and annual subscriptions, are not considered capital expenditure if the membership's continuance depends on regular payments, and therefore are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1).

CIT v. Karnataka Power Corporation
247 ITR 268 · 2001 · Supreme Court
124
citing judgments

Income earned during the project construction stage, which has a direct nexus or is inextricably linked to the project's setting up, constitutes a capital receipt not liable to tax and reduces the project cost.

Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT
382 ITR 179 · 2016 · High Court
122
citing judgments

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowable even if no tax is paid in India on the corresponding income due to deductions under sections 10A or 10AA, or losses in other units. The scope of income eligible for deduction under Section 10AA includes interest on deposits and realized gains on forward contracts.

DDIT v. Savvis Communication Corporation
69 Taxmann.com 106 · 2016 · ITAT
107
citing judgments

Payments for web hosting services, including data back-up, maintenance, security, and uninterrupted services, are not taxable as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, as they do not constitute 'consideration for use of, or right to use, scientific equipment'.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT, Range10(2), Mumbai
234 CTR 1 · 2010 · High Court
97
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee in relation to income not forming part of the total income is not deductible under Section 14A(1). The disallowance must be restricted to direct and indirect expenses having an approximate connection with the earning of such exempt income, and Rule 8D applies from Assessment Year 2008-09.

Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT
280 ITR 643 · 2006 · Supreme Court
96
citing judgments

Assessees are entitled to compensation for the inordinate delay by the Income Tax Department in refunding excess tax, which includes interest on the statutory interest due under section 244A for such delayed refunds.

Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
363 ITR 658 · 2014 · Supreme Court
91
citing judgments

The Department has a moral and legal obligation to refund excess tax collected from taxpayers, along with interest. An assessee is entitled to interest on the amount of taxes refunded, including interest on interest, as per Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Dinesh Kumar Goel
331 ITR 10 · 2011 · High Court
87
citing judgments

Income is recognized when it is absolutely ascertained, determined, and specified, conferring an exclusive right of receipt upon the assessee, irrespective of the accounting period.

Sunil Siddharthbhai v. CIT
156 ITR 509 · 1985 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

A partner's contribution of a personal asset to a partnership firm does not amount to a "transfer" for capital gains purposes under the Income-tax Act, as the consideration (the partner's interest in the firm) is indeterminate, and the computational machinery for capital gains fails.

Judgments on Section 244A

M/S Salarpuria Properties Pvt Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir. -1, Kolkata

The appeal is treated as dismissed

ITA 500/KOL/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.500/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S Salarpuria Properties Pvt. Ltd …………….…...……………....Appellant C/O M/S Salarpuria Jajodia & Co., 3Rd Floor, 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata-700072. [Pan: Aagcs8492P] Vs. Dcit,Circle-1(1), Kolkata………......................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. Jhajaria, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 17.10. 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : 17.10.2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 20.03.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-5, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Appeal Is Time Barred By 852 Days. A Separate Application For Condonation Of Delay Has Been Filed Wherein It Has Been Mentioned That Though The Impugned Order Was Passed By The Cit(A) On 20.03.2018 But The Copy Of The Same Was Never Physically Served Upon The Assessee. The Order Seemed To Have Been Served Through E-Mail, However, The E-Mail Of The Company, Due To Some Inadvertence, Was Not Opened By The Staff Of The Company During The Relevant Period & Therefore, The Assessee Company/Its Directors Were Not Aware Of The

Section 244ASection 250Section 801ASection 80I