Section 238 of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 238 is Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction (126 Taxmann.com 132), cited in 192 of the 32 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 238

Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
126 Taxmann.com 132 · 2021 · Supreme Court
192
citing judgments

Once a resolution plan is approved by the NCLT under Section 31(1) of the IBC, all claims, including statutory dues owed to the Central or State Government, are frozen and become binding on all stakeholders. This extinguishes any prior tax demands, such as those under Section 178(6) of the Income Tax Act, if not part of the approved plan.

Krishnaswamy S. Pd v. Union of India
281 ITR 305 · 2006 · Supreme Court
68
citing judgments

The case upholds the legal maxim "Lex Non Cogit ad impossibilia", meaning one is not required under the law to perform what is impossible. This principle applies when compliance with a legal requirement is practically impossible.

Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. v. Hotel Gaudavan (P.) Ltd.
88 Taxmann.com 202 · 2017 · Supreme Court
54
citing judgments
Pr. CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.
107 Taxmann.com 481 · 2019 · Supreme Court
34
citing judgments

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 overrides any other enactment, including the Income Tax Act, when an NCLT has declared a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. Proceedings against the assessee are barred during the moratorium.

Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons (P.) Ltd. v. Edelweis Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
9 SCC 657 · 2021 · Reported
33
citing judgments

All claims, including statutory dues, that predate the approval of a resolution plan under the IBC stand extinguished by operation of law. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for such claims if they are not part of the approved plan.

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd.
138 Taxmann.com 73 · 2022 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments
Murli Industries Limited v. ACIT
441 ITR 8 · 2022 · High Court
22
citing judgments
236 ITR 832 (Guj) (para 21) Snowcem India Ltd. v. Deputy CIT
313 ITR 170 · 2009 · High Court
21
citing judgments
Mrs. Jai Rajkumar v. Stanbic Bank Ghana Ltd.
101 Taxmann.com 329 · 2019 · High Court
19
citing judgments
Palogix Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
135 Taxmann.com 73 · 2022 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 238

DCIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S WINSOME YARNS LTD,, CHANDIGARH

Appeals stand dismissed as non-maintainable

ITA 886/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.646/Chandi/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1232/Chandi/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.571/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. Cit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.31/Chandi/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.886/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Ishant Jain (Rp) – Ld. Ar (Virtual Mode) Revenue By : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Drs

For Appellant: Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
Section 14Section 17Section 238Section 7

M/S WINSOME YARNS LTD.,,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeals stand dismissed as non-maintainable

ITA 571/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.646/Chandi/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1232/Chandi/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.571/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. Cit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.31/Chandi/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.886/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Ishant Jain (Rp) – Ld. Ar (Virtual Mode) Revenue By : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Drs

For Appellant: Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
Section 14Section 17Section 238Section 7

ACIT,, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S WINSOME YARN LTD.,, CHANDIGARH

Appeals stand dismissed as non-maintainable

ITA 31/CHANDI/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Mar 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.646/Chandi/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1232/Chandi/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.571/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. Cit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.31/Chandi/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.886/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Ishant Jain (Rp) – Ld. Ar (Virtual Mode) Revenue By : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Drs

For Appellant: Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
Section 14Section 17Section 238Section 7

M/S WINSOME YARNS LTD.,,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT,, CHANDIGARH

Appeals stand dismissed as non-maintainable

ITA 1232/CHANDI/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Mar 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.646/Chandi/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1232/Chandi/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.571/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. Cit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.31/Chandi/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.886/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Ishant Jain (Rp) – Ld. Ar (Virtual Mode) Revenue By : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Drs

For Appellant: Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
Section 14Section 17Section 238Section 7

WINSOME YARNS LTD.,,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

Appeals stand dismissed as non-maintainable

ITA 646/CHANDI/2008[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Mar 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.646/Chandi/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1232/Chandi/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.571/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. Cit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.31/Chandi/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.886/Chandi/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit / Acit [Circle 4(1)] M/S Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh Sco 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Ishant Jain (Rp) – Ld. Ar (Virtual Mode) Revenue By : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (Cit) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Drs

For Appellant: Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
Section 14Section 17Section 238Section 7

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1381/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Before Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1380 & 1381/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2017-18 Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of Income No.113, Janpriya Crest, Tax, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai- 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca3012H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Ms.Vinitha, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Arv Sreenivasan, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Filed By The Assessee-Company Directed Against The Orders Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 254 Of The Income Tax Act-1961 Dated 30.03.2025 & 31.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2017-18 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Two Appeals Of The Assessee, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Ms.Vinitha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 13Section 143(3)Section 31Section 7

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1380/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Before Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1380 & 1381/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2017-18 Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of Income No.113, Janpriya Crest, Tax, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai- 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca3012H] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Ms.Vinitha, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Arv Sreenivasan, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Filed By The Assessee-Company Directed Against The Orders Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 254 Of The Income Tax Act-1961 Dated 30.03.2025 & 31.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2017-18 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Two Appeals Of The Assessee, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Ms.Vinitha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 13Section 143(3)Section 31Section 7

Showing 120 of 32 · Page 1 of 2