ACIT,, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S WINSOME YARN LTD.,, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that, in light of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC and the overriding effect of Section 238 of the Code, the present appeals against the assessee could not continue. Consequently, all appeals were dismissed as non-maintainable, with a provision for either party to seek revival if circumstances change in the future.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd., is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) before the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). A moratorium has been declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, prohibiting the initiation or continuation of suits and proceedings against the corporate debtor, as confirmed by the Resolution Professional.
What were the issues?
Whether income tax appeals against a corporate debtor can proceed when a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and a moratorium under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, are in effect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Income Tax Act, 1961, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 14, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 17, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 238
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
1
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH HYBRID HEARING BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM 1. आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.646/CHANDI/2008 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.1232/CHANDI/2009 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 3. आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.571/CHANDI/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd. Addl. CIT / ACIT [Circle 4(1)] SCO 191-192, Sector – 34, बनाम/ Vs. Range 4, Chandigarh Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAACW-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 4. आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.31/CHANDI/2010 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) & 5. आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.886/CHANDI/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) DCIT / ACIT [Circle 4(1)] M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd. बनाम/ Vs. Range-4, Chandigarh SCO 191-192, Sector – 34, Chandigarh "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAACW-1911-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Ishant Jain (RP) – Ld. AR (Virtual Mode) Revenue by : Dr. Vivek Aggarwal (CIT) & Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. DRs
सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 17-03-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Dat
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026