Section 206C(1A) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.394

Section 206C(1A) falls under section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 394 (Collection of tax at source) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 394 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

37 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 206C(1A).

Judgments on Section 206C(1A)

Maliwal Bherulal Jagnnath HUF, Jamnagar vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(3), Jamnagar

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 855/RJT/2026[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.855/Rjt/2026 [ "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13 ] Maliwal Bherulal Jagnnath Huf, Income Tax Officer Ward 1(3), 1 Block No D 3 285, Nr Patel Vs. Jamnagar, Aaykar Bhawan, Jamnagar, Samaj Ranjit Nagar, Gujarat-361001 Jamnagar, Gujarat-361005 "थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadhm7757B (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Shishir Kumar, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 27/07/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 21/09/2026 :: Order :: Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2012- 13, Is Directed Against The Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) By Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Dated 10.03.2026, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 206C(6) & 206C(7) Of The Act, On 15.05.2017. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: 1. On The Basis Of The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & The Learned Assessing Officer Have Erred In Law & On Facts In Sustaining The Tcs Liability U/S 206C (1) Of The Act Of Rs. 25,42,092/-, On Total Sale Of Rs. 25,42,09,224/- For The F.Y. 2011-12, By Not Considering The Fact That The Assessee Has Duly Submitted The Form 27C As Per Section 206C(1A) Amount To Rs. 13,60,28,364/- & Declaration Obtained From Buyer As Prescribed In Form 27Ba As Per First Proviso To Section 206C(6A) Amounts To Rs. 11,81,80,860/- Aggregating

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Shishir Kumar, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(3)Section 206C(6)Section 250

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 197/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.193 To 197/Ran/2024 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Years :2013-2014 To 2017-2018) Vs Jharkhand Acit, Ranchi State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Khanij Nigam Bhawan, Doranda, Nepal House Area, Ranchi Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 2578 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Patna-3, All Dated 28.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 & 2017- 2018, Respectively. 2. An Adjournment Has Been Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee By Shri Aloke Kumar Choudhuri, Gm(Finance) Of The Assessee Corporation Stating That Due To Unforeseen Circumstances, They Have Been Unable To Engage Alternative Representation & Prepare The Case For The Hearing Within The Scheduled Timeframe. The Reasons Given Being Unsatisfactory, The Adjournment Application Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Stands Rejected. 3. Shri Rajib Jain, Ld. Cit-Dr Has Also Sought Adjournment Stating That The Order Has Been Passed By Him As Cit(A) & His Stands Be Precluded From Defending The Said Order As He Has Given Relief To The Assessee & It 2

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Petition filed)For Respondent: None (Adjournment Petition filed)
Section 206CSection 260

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 196/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.193 To 197/Ran/2024 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Years :2013-2014 To 2017-2018) Vs Jharkhand Acit, Ranchi State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Khanij Nigam Bhawan, Doranda, Nepal House Area, Ranchi Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 2578 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Patna-3, All Dated 28.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 & 2017- 2018, Respectively. 2. An Adjournment Has Been Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee By Shri Aloke Kumar Choudhuri, Gm(Finance) Of The Assessee Corporation Stating That Due To Unforeseen Circumstances, They Have Been Unable To Engage Alternative Representation & Prepare The Case For The Hearing Within The Scheduled Timeframe. The Reasons Given Being Unsatisfactory, The Adjournment Application Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Stands Rejected. 3. Shri Rajib Jain, Ld. Cit-Dr Has Also Sought Adjournment Stating That The Order Has Been Passed By Him As Cit(A) & His Stands Be Precluded From Defending The Said Order As He Has Given Relief To The Assessee & It 2

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Petition filed)For Respondent: None (Adjournment Petition filed)
Section 206CSection 260

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 195/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.193 To 197/Ran/2024 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Years :2013-2014 To 2017-2018) Vs Jharkhand Acit, Ranchi State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Khanij Nigam Bhawan, Doranda, Nepal House Area, Ranchi Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 2578 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Patna-3, All Dated 28.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 & 2017- 2018, Respectively. 2. An Adjournment Has Been Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee By Shri Aloke Kumar Choudhuri, Gm(Finance) Of The Assessee Corporation Stating That Due To Unforeseen Circumstances, They Have Been Unable To Engage Alternative Representation & Prepare The Case For The Hearing Within The Scheduled Timeframe. The Reasons Given Being Unsatisfactory, The Adjournment Application Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Stands Rejected. 3. Shri Rajib Jain, Ld. Cit-Dr Has Also Sought Adjournment Stating That The Order Has Been Passed By Him As Cit(A) & His Stands Be Precluded From Defending The Said Order As He Has Given Relief To The Assessee & It 2

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Petition filed)For Respondent: None (Adjournment Petition filed)
Section 206CSection 260

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 194/RAN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.193 To 197/Ran/2024 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Years :2013-2014 To 2017-2018) Vs Jharkhand Acit, Ranchi State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Khanij Nigam Bhawan, Doranda, Nepal House Area, Ranchi Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 2578 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Patna-3, All Dated 28.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 & 2017- 2018, Respectively. 2. An Adjournment Has Been Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee By Shri Aloke Kumar Choudhuri, Gm(Finance) Of The Assessee Corporation Stating That Due To Unforeseen Circumstances, They Have Been Unable To Engage Alternative Representation & Prepare The Case For The Hearing Within The Scheduled Timeframe. The Reasons Given Being Unsatisfactory, The Adjournment Application Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Stands Rejected. 3. Shri Rajib Jain, Ld. Cit-Dr Has Also Sought Adjournment Stating That The Order Has Been Passed By Him As Cit(A) & His Stands Be Precluded From Defending The Said Order As He Has Given Relief To The Assessee & It 2

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Petition filed)For Respondent: None (Adjournment Petition filed)
Section 206CSection 260

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Ranchi

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 193/RAN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.193 To 197/Ran/2024 (निि ारण वर्ा / Assessment Years :2013-2014 To 2017-2018) Vs Jharkhand Acit, Ranchi State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, Khanij Nigam Bhawan, Doranda, Nepal House Area, Ranchi Jharkhand-834002 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcj 2578 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Patna-3, All Dated 28.12.2023 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 & 2017- 2018, Respectively. 2. An Adjournment Has Been Sought On Behalf Of The Assessee By Shri Aloke Kumar Choudhuri, Gm(Finance) Of The Assessee Corporation Stating That Due To Unforeseen Circumstances, They Have Been Unable To Engage Alternative Representation & Prepare The Case For The Hearing Within The Scheduled Timeframe. The Reasons Given Being Unsatisfactory, The Adjournment Application Filed On Behalf Of The Assessee Stands Rejected. 3. Shri Rajib Jain, Ld. Cit-Dr Has Also Sought Adjournment Stating That The Order Has Been Passed By Him As Cit(A) & His Stands Be Precluded From Defending The Said Order As He Has Given Relief To The Assessee & It 2

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Petition filed)For Respondent: None (Adjournment Petition filed)
Section 206CSection 260