MALIWAL BHERULAL JAGNNATH HUF,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in the scrap business, failed to collect Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on sales amounting to Rs. 25,42,09,224/-. The assessee claimed to have submitted Form 27C and declarations in Form 27BA, but these were filed belatedly and with the wrong authority.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a minor delay in filing declarations in Form 27C or Form 27BA does not defeat the assessee's claim for non-collection of TCS, following the precedent of the jurisdictional High Court. The procedural lapse was not considered a reason to invoke the liability.
What were the issues?
Whether a procedural lapse in belatedly filing declarations with the wrong authority for TCS exemption can lead to the imposition of TCS liability and penalties.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 206C(1),Section 206C(1A),Section 206C(6),Section 206C(7),Section 272A(2)(k)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC”
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2012- 13, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 10.03.2026, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 206C(6) and 206C(7) of the Act, on 15.05.2017. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:
On the basis of the facts and circumstances of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 206C(1)
- Mani Square Limited, Kolkata vs Additional CIT, Range 2 (TDS), KolkataITA 1719/KOL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2010-2011
- M/S.Sri Bhavani Saw Mill, Tirunelveli vs ITO, TDS Ward, TirunelveliITA 3615/CHNY/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sri Bhavani Saw Mill, Tirunelveli vs ITO, TDS Ward, TirunelveliITA 3614/CHNY/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sri Bhavani Wood Industries… vs ITO, TDS Ward, TirunelveliITA 3613/CHNY/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sri Bhavani Wood Industries… vs ITO, TDS Ward, TirunelveliITA 3612/CHNY/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026