Section 200A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.399

Section 200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 399 (Processing) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 399 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 200A is Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI (73 Taxmann.com 252), cited in 1,778 of the 4,379 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 200A

Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI
73 Taxmann.com 252 · 2016 · High Court
1,778
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E are not applicable for periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the amendment to section 200A inserting clause (c) was effective from that date.

Kourani v. Union OF India
83 Taxmann.com 137 · 2017 · High Court
1,708
citing judgments

The fee under Section 234E for late filing of TDS/TCS statements cannot be levied retrospectively by processing an intimation under Section 200A for defaults occurring before the amendment allowing such processing.

CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
367 ITR 466 · 2014 · Supreme Court
1,558
citing judgments

Taxing statutes are presumed to operate prospectively unless a clear contrary intention for retrospective application is evident. The law applicable for determining tax liability is that which stands on the first day of the assessment year, following the principle that law looks forward, not backward (lex prospicit non respicit).

Fateh Raj Singhvi & Ors. v. UOI
289 CTR 602 · 2016 · High Court
844
citing judgments

A fee under Section 234E cannot be levied or adjusted in an intimation under Section 200A for TDS statements pertaining to periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the enabling amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) came into effect only from that date.

Rashmikant Kundalia v. Union of India
54 Taxmann.com 200 · 2015 · High Court
702
citing judgments

Section 234E, levying late fees for delayed filing of TDS statements under section 200(3), is constitutionally valid and constitutes a compensatory fee, not a punitive penalty. Before treating any person as an assessee-in-default, an opportunity of being heard must be provided.

Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI
440 ITR 26 · 2022 · High Court
614
citing judgments

The fee under Section 234E of the Income-tax Act cannot be levied for defaults in filing TDS statements committed prior to June 1, 2015, as the provision for its levy became effective only from that date.

Gajanan Constructions v. DCIT
74 Taxmann.com 6 · 2016 · ITAT
465
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E can only be levied prospectively from June 1, 2015. Levying late fees for periods prior to this date is not permissible.

Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. Union of India
63 Taxmann.com 243 · 2015 · High Court
397
citing judgments

The imposition of fees for late filing of TDS/TCS returns prior to the Finance Act, 2015 amendments was not illegal, and the Rajasthan High Court found no justification to interfere with such compensatory fees.

Jiji Varghese v. ITO(TDS) & Ors.
443 ITR 267 · 2022 · High Court
220
citing judgments

Section 234E fee cannot be imposed for periods prior to June 1, 2015. This applies even when the processing of the return under Section 200A(c) occurred before that date.

Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper Primary School v. Union of India and Others
392 ITR 457 · 2017 · High Court
217
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 200A

Kailash Housing Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 357/CTK/2018[2014-15(4th Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.350, 351,356&357/Ctk/2018 (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2014-2015) (4Th Quarter)26Q Kailash Housing Ltd., Vs. Acit, Cpc, Tds, Ghaziabad, Plot No.1133, Bomikhal, New Delhi Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar Tanno. : Abck 6354 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/10/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Arising Out Of Intimation U/S.200A Of The I.T.Act, 1961 Issued By The Cpc (Tds), Ghaziabad Dated 16.10.2016 & 20.12.2016, Respectively For The Fourth Quarter For The Assessment Year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015, Against The Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act For Late Filing Of Quarterly Tds Return & Confirm By The Cit(A). 2. Ld. Ar Before Us Submitted That The Cit(A) Has Committed Gross Error Of Law As Well As In Fact While Confirming The Impugned Order & Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act In The Aforesaid Appeals Ignoring The Submission Of The Assessee. Therefore, Ld. Ar Submitted That The Levy Of Late Fee In All The Above Appeals Deserves To Be Deleted. 3. On The Other Hand, Ld.Dr Relied On The Orders Of Authorities

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

Kailash Housing Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 356/CTK/2018[2014-15 (4th Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.350, 351,356&357/Ctk/2018 (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2014-2015) (4Th Quarter)26Q Kailash Housing Ltd., Vs. Acit, Cpc, Tds, Ghaziabad, Plot No.1133, Bomikhal, New Delhi Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar Tanno. : Abck 6354 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/10/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Arising Out Of Intimation U/S.200A Of The I.T.Act, 1961 Issued By The Cpc (Tds), Ghaziabad Dated 16.10.2016 & 20.12.2016, Respectively For The Fourth Quarter For The Assessment Year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015, Against The Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act For Late Filing Of Quarterly Tds Return & Confirm By The Cit(A). 2. Ld. Ar Before Us Submitted That The Cit(A) Has Committed Gross Error Of Law As Well As In Fact While Confirming The Impugned Order & Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act In The Aforesaid Appeals Ignoring The Submission Of The Assessee. Therefore, Ld. Ar Submitted That The Levy Of Late Fee In All The Above Appeals Deserves To Be Deleted. 3. On The Other Hand, Ld.Dr Relied On The Orders Of Authorities

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

Kailash Housing Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 351/CTK/2018[2013-14 (4th Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.350, 351,356&357/Ctk/2018 (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2014-2015) (4Th Quarter)26Q Kailash Housing Ltd., Vs. Acit, Cpc, Tds, Ghaziabad, Plot No.1133, Bomikhal, New Delhi Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar Tanno. : Abck 6354 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/10/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Arising Out Of Intimation U/S.200A Of The I.T.Act, 1961 Issued By The Cpc (Tds), Ghaziabad Dated 16.10.2016 & 20.12.2016, Respectively For The Fourth Quarter For The Assessment Year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015, Against The Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act For Late Filing Of Quarterly Tds Return & Confirm By The Cit(A). 2. Ld. Ar Before Us Submitted That The Cit(A) Has Committed Gross Error Of Law As Well As In Fact While Confirming The Impugned Order & Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act In The Aforesaid Appeals Ignoring The Submission Of The Assessee. Therefore, Ld. Ar Submitted That The Levy Of Late Fee In All The Above Appeals Deserves To Be Deleted. 3. On The Other Hand, Ld.Dr Relied On The Orders Of Authorities

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

Kailash Housing Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, Ghaziabad

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 350/CTK/2018[2013-14 (4th Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.350, 351,356&357/Ctk/2018 (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(4Th Quarter) 24Q (Ay:2014-2015) (4Th Quarter)26Q Kailash Housing Ltd., Vs. Acit, Cpc, Tds, Ghaziabad, Plot No.1133, Bomikhal, New Delhi Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar Tanno. : Abck 6354 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/10/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Appeals Arising Out Of Intimation U/S.200A Of The I.T.Act, 1961 Issued By The Cpc (Tds), Ghaziabad Dated 16.10.2016 & 20.12.2016, Respectively For The Fourth Quarter For The Assessment Year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015, Against The Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act For Late Filing Of Quarterly Tds Return & Confirm By The Cit(A). 2. Ld. Ar Before Us Submitted That The Cit(A) Has Committed Gross Error Of Law As Well As In Fact While Confirming The Impugned Order & Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of The Act In The Aforesaid Appeals Ignoring The Submission Of The Assessee. Therefore, Ld. Ar Submitted That The Levy Of Late Fee In All The Above Appeals Deserves To Be Deleted. 3. On The Other Hand, Ld.Dr Relied On The Orders Of Authorities

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

Government High School, Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT(TDS), Bhubaneswar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 379/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.379/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Govt. High School, Unit-Vi, Vs. Acit(Tds), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar-751001 Tanno. : Bbng0 1193 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14/10/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Appeal Arising Out Of Intimation U/S.200A Of The I.T.Act, 1961 Issued By The Cpc (Tds), Ghaziabad Dated 03.06.2015 For The Fourth Quarter For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, Against The Levy Of Fee U/S.234E Of Rs.74,400/- For Late Filing Of Quarterly Tds Return. 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Is Called For Second Round, Therefore, The Bench Decided To Dispose Off The Appeal Of The Assessee After Considering The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Material Available On Record & Considering The Submissions Of Ld. Dr. 3. The Assessee Has Filed Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. For That The Order Of Assessment Is Against The Settle Principle Of Law.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Lenka, DR
Section 200ASection 201Section 234E