Section 194H of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.393

Section 194H of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 393 (Tax to be deducted at source) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 393 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 194H is CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd. (33 ITR 681), cited in 165 of the 1,314 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 194H

CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd.
33 ITR 681 · 1958 · High Court
165
citing judgments

An addition to income is revenue neutral if its tax impact remains the same regardless of the year in which it is assessed. Assessments should not dispute the year of addition when the tax rate and impact are consistent, to avoid unnecessary disputes and potential loss to revenue.

CIT v. Idea Cellular Ltd.
325 ITR 148 · 2010 · High Court
155
citing judgments

Discounts offered to distributors under a tightly controlled relationship constitute commission and are subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Bharti Cellular Ltd.
330 ITR 239 · 2011 · Supreme Court
147
citing judgments

The Supreme Court holds that for a service to qualify as 'fees for technical services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of a DTAA, direct human involvement or intervention in rendering the service is essential. This principle applies to telecommunication services like interconnect charges and roaming charges, and also to services related to software use.

Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. DCIT
372 ITR 33 · 2015 · High Court
139
citing judgments

Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is not applicable on the discount extended to distributors of pre-paid services, as the distributor does not earn income at the time of purchasing pre-paid cards from the assessee. The assessee is not in possession of any income belonging to the distributor at that point.

Merilyn Shipping & Transports v. Addl. CIT
136 ITD 23 · 2012 · ITAT
139
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance applies only to expenses that remain payable at the end of the financial year, not to expenses that have been actually paid during the previous year without deduction of tax at source.

State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India
257 ITR 202 · 2002 · High Court
121
citing judgments

Supplementary commission forional or extra services does not fall within the ambit of Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This may affect the applicability of certificates issued under Section 197.

CIT v. HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd.
305 ITR 409 · 2008 · Supreme Court
118
citing judgments

For computing book profits under Section 115JB, an Assessing Officer's power is limited to examining duly certified books and making adjustments only as per the Explanation. A provision for bad and doubtful debts, being a diminution in the value of an asset (receivable), does not constitute a 'provision for liability' under Clause (c) of the Explanation and therefore cannot be added back.

Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT
232 ITR 359 · 1998 · Supreme Court
99
citing judgments

Expenditure on technical aid fees for factory setup and rights to sell products under a collaboration agreement is capital in nature, not revenue, as it provides an enduring benefit.

Hindustan Coca Cola v. CIT
402 ITR 539 · 2018 · High Court
73
citing judgments

Discounts allowed by a business to grow its operations in a competitive market are acceptable and cannot be disallowed. Expenses incurred for business growth in a competitive world are not to be disallowed.

Nabha Investments Pvt. ltd. v. UOI
248 ITR 292 · 2001 · High Court
65
citing judgments

An assessment order is considered erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, warranting revision under Section 263, if there is an inadequate inquiry or non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer, satisfying the two cumulative conditions required for revisional powers.

Judgments on Section 194H

Cooperative Cane Development Union Ltd Balrampur, Balrampur vs. ITO Gonda New, Gonda

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 737/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jun 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2018-19 U.P. Cooperative Cane Union Vs. Assessing Officer, Limited, Balrampur, U.P. National E-Assessment Center, Delhi Pan: Aaalc0029P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. J.N. Shukla, Adv Revenue By: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Addl Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 05.05.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.06.2026 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 25.08.2025, Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y. 2018-19 That Was Passed On 9.04.2021. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under: - “1. That The Cit (Appeal) Nfac Delhi Has Committed Manifest Error Of Law By Rejecting The First Appeal Of The Appellant Without Appreciating Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Of The Appellant. 2.That The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit (Appeal) Nfac Delhi Dated 25-08-2025 In Which The Disallowances Made By The Ld Ao In Respect Of Claim Of Deduction U/S 80P On Whole Income & Interest Earned By The Assessee Were Upheld & The Appeal Of The Assessee Were Dismissed. 3. That The Appellant Is A Cooperative Society Registered Under The U.P Cooperative Society Registration Act 1965 & Engage In The Business & Marketing Of Sugarcane. The Appellant Derives From Commission Received From The Sugarmill & Interest Income Charged To Provide Credit Facilities To Its Members For Purchase Of Cane Seeds, Fertilizers & Insecticides & Its Total Income Is Deducted From The Grass

For Appellant: Sh. J.N. Shukla, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Addl CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

Income Tax Officer, Hisar vs. Deepak, Hisar

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4791/DEL/2025[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2026

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2013-14] Ito Vs Deepak Aaykar Bhawan, M/S. Neno Computer, Sector-14, Hisar, Near Pcsd School, Hansi, Hisar, Haryana Haryana-125033 Pan-Amypd4928Q Appellant Respondent Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Pratham Kindra, Adv. Date Of Hearing 16.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 27.05.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 09.06.2025 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“Nfac), Delhi [“Ld.Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Nfac/2012-13/10169880 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 29.03.2022 Passed U/S 147 R.W.S. 144 R.W.S. 144B Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & No Return Of Income Was Filed In The Year Under Appeal. As Per Information Available With The Ao In Itb Portal, There Were Deposits Of Cash In The Bank Accounts Of More Than Inr 14 Crores & Tds U/S 194H Of Inr 49,040/- & Since No Return Was Filed Therefore, The Case Of The Assessee Was Re-Opened U/S 147 Of The Act After Regarding The Reasons & Notice U/S 148 Of The Act Was Issued. However, The Assessee Has Not Complied With Any Of The Notice Nor Filed Return Of Income In Response To Notice U/S 148 Of The Act Therefore, The Ao Has Passed The Re-Assessment Order By Making Additions Of The Entire Transactions Appearing In Itba Module Of Inr 14,08,85,390/-.

Section 147Section 148Section 194HSection 250