Section 17(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.16, 17, 18

Section 17(2)(vi) falls under section 17 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 16 (Income from salary), section 17 (Perquisite) and section 18 (Profits in lieu of salary) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 16 of the 2025 ActRead section 17 of the 2025 ActRead section 18 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 17(2)(vi) is State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India (257 ITR 202), cited in 121 of the 40 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 17(2)(vi)

State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India
257 ITR 202 · 2002 · High Court
121
citing judgments

Supplementary commission forional or extra services does not fall within the ambit of Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This may affect the applicability of certificates issued under Section 197.

CIT v. Infosys Technologies Ltd.
297 ITR 167 · 2008 · Supreme Court
115
citing judgments

Allotment of shares to employees under an Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) before April 1, 2000, is not a taxable perquisite if the benefit's value is unascertainable at the time of option exercise due to conditions like a lock-in period.

CIT v. Bakelite Hylam Ltd.
237 ITR 392 · 1999 · High Court
24
citing judgments

An assessing authority is entitled to determine the quantum of refund during a regular assessment made under section 143(3), and the assessed income can fall below the returned income.

CIT v. Qatar Airways
332 ITR 253 · 2011 · High Court
24
citing judgments

A difference between the commercial price and published price of airline tickets is not a special commission or brokerage under section 194H, if the airline has discretion to reduce the published price.

Rupee Finance and Management (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
81 Taxmann.com 249 · 2017 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be held to its original voluntary disallowance if it was made under a wrong belief, especially after a tribunal has ruled in its favor, as the Income Tax Act aims to tax real income.

Gujarat Gas Co. Ltd. v. Jt. CIT
111 Taxmann 144 · 2000 · High Court
10
citing judgments
CIT v. Biocon Ltd.
131 Taxmann.com 188 · 2021 · Supreme Court
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Piramal Health Care Ltd.
55 Taxmann.com 534 · 2015 · High Court
9
citing judgments
Sons & Co. (India) Ltd. v. ITO
233 ITR 809 · 1996 · Supreme Court
5
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. V.M. Salgaocar and Brothers Pvt. Ltd.
198 ITR 738 · 1992 · Reported
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 17(2)(vi)