Section 145(1) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.276

Section 145(1) falls under section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 276 (Method of accounting) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 276 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 145(1) is CIT v. Dilip Singh Sardarsingh Bagga (201 ITR 995), cited in 40 of the 103 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 145(1)

CIT v. Dilip Singh Sardarsingh Bagga
201 ITR 995 · 1993 · High Court
40
citing judgments

Registration of a motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act is not a prerequisite for claiming depreciation under the Income Tax Act. Beneficial ownership and actual use for business purposes are sufficient.

Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. ACIT
38 SOT 553 · 2010 · ITAT
37
citing judgments

Amortization of premium on purchase of government securities is allowable as a deduction if it is in line with RBI's prudential norms and the assessee follows a consistent accounting system.

CIT v. Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
257 ITR 88 · 2002 · High Court
34
citing judgments

Depreciation on a vehicle cannot be denied solely because the transfer was not recorded under the Motor Vehicles Act or the vehicle stood in the vendor's name in official records, if the assessee can establish ownership.

Prestige Estate Projects (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
33 DTR 514 · 2010 · ITAT
28
citing judgments

A real estate developer adopting the completed contract method of accounting cannot be forced to follow the percentage completion method under AS-7 if AS-7 has not been specified by the Central Government under section 145(2). The Assessing Officer cannot reject accounts under section 145(3) solely on this ground.

86 Taxmann.com 137 (SC) 16. K. Venkataramaiah v. A. Setharam Reddy & Ors., 1963 AIR 1526 17. ITO vs. B.N. Bhattacharya
112 ITR 423 · 1978 · High Court
27
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer can admit additional evidence during assessment proceedings if it is necessary to determine the true total income of the assessee.

CIT v. Hughes
215 Taxmann 136 · 2013 · High Court
20
citing judgments
CIT v. Realest Builders & Services Ltd. 216 CTR (SC) 345
382 ITR 630 · 2016 · High Court
20
citing judgments
CIT v. Federal Bank
301 ITR 188 · 2008 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Interest on securities becomes due and receivable only upon maturity and cannot be taxed prior to maturity. The entitlement to interest arises only at that point.

Kannur District Cooperative Bank v. CIT
365 ITR 343 · 2014 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Cooperative banks are eligible to claim deduction under both limbs of Section 36(1)(viia) for all types of loans and advances extended by their rural branches.

Munjal Showa Ltd. v. DCIT
94 TTJ 227 · 2005 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Foreign currency, and therefore derivative/forward contracts in respect of foreign currency, cannot be considered a commodity for the purpose of speculative transaction provisions. Such contracts entered into for hedging foreign exchange fluctuations are not speculative.

Judgments on Section 145(1)

ACIT, TDS, Noida vs. M/S St Microelectronics Pvt. Ltd., Greater Noida

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5597/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jun 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. I.C. Sudhir & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2007-08 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs. St Microelectronics Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Tds, Noida Plot No. 11, Knoledge Park-111, Greater Noida Gir/Pan : Aaacs3406M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Smt. Rishpal Bedi, Sr.Dr Respondent By Sh. K.V.S.R. Krishna, Ca Date Of Hearing 19.04.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 10.06.2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: This Appeal Of The Revenue Is Directed Against Order Dated 19/07/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Appeals), Noida For Assessment Year 2007-08 Raising Following Grounds: “That Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Directing To Delete The Order U/S 201(1)/201(1A) Of The I.T. Act Passed By The Assessing Officer Ignoring The Fact That Assessee Must Follow The Mercantile System Of Accounting For These Payments & Erred In Further Allowing The Assessee To Follow The Cash System Of Accounting For These Payments Solely On The Grund Of Sap Environment Being Followed By The Assessee.” 2. The Facts In Brief Are That During Tax Deducted At Source (Tds) Verification By The Tds Assessing Officer, It Was Observed That Tax Was Not Deducted On Certain Expenses Debited In Profit & Loss. The Assessing Officer Called For The Tax Audit Report In Form No. 3 Cd & Observed That The Auditor Had Also Pointed

Section 145(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40a