Section 129 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.244

Section 129 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 244 (Change of incumbent of an office) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 244 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 129 is Canara Housing Development Co. v. DCIT (49 Taxmann.com 98), cited in 283 of the 148 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 129

Canara Housing Development Co. v. DCIT
49 Taxmann.com 98 · 2014 · High Court
283
citing judgments

Proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act are not confined solely to incriminating material found during a search, and the Assessing Officer can assess total income for the relevant years.

P.M. Mohammed Meerakhan v. CIT
73 ITR 735 · 1969 · Supreme Court
58
citing judgments

The assessee bears the onus to prove the genuineness and voluntary nature of donations received, including corpus donations. Failure to discharge this burden allows the Assessing Officer to treat such donations as non-genuine or accommodation entries.

Sarla Handicrafts (P.) Ltd. v. Addl.CIT
124 TTJ 674 · 2009 · ITAT
55
citing judgments

The assessing officer can proceed with a search and seizure assessment under section 153A even if the original return was filed in response to a notice under section 142(1). Surrender of income during a search is a key factor in such assessments.

CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd.
28 Taxmann.com 429 · 2012 · Supreme Court
50
citing judgments

Club membership fees paid by a company for its employees are considered pure business expenses, allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Smt. Leena Ramachandran
339 ITR 296 · 2011 · High Court
44
citing judgments

The assessee is entitled to a deduction of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) on borrowed funds utilized for acquiring shares, provided the shares are held as stock-in-trade as part of a share trading business.

Citation: CIT v. M. Yesodha
351 ITR 265 · 2013 · High Court
42
citing judgments
ITO v. Diza
255 ITR 573 · 2002 · High Court
42
citing judgments

For an addition under Section 68, the assessee must satisfactorily explain the source of depositors and their creditworthiness; mere receipt of funds via banking channels or furnishing particulars is not conclusive proof of genuineness.

Smt. Manshi Mahendra Pitkar v. ITO 1(2), Thane
73 Taxmann.com 68 · 2016 · ITAT
41
citing judgments

A bank passbook alone does not constitute the books of account of an assessee for the purpose of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Union Bank of India
308 CTR 797 · 2019 · High Court
41
citing judgments

For banking companies, the machinery provisions of Section 115JB(2) of the Income Tax Act are unworkable due to a legal dichotomy created by the first proviso.

Charchit Agarwal v. ACIT
34 SOT 348 · 2009 · ITAT
33
citing judgments

A claim for exemption from taxability must be made in the original return under section 139(1) or a revised return under section 139(5). Any claim made outside these mandatory time limits, including during a section 153A assessment, is not allowable.

Judgments on Section 129

Chengalvarayan Banuprakash, Okkyam Thoraipakkam vs. Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, Addl / JCIT(A), Thane

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 362/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.362/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Chengalvarayan Banuprakash, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Plot No. 35, 2Nd Floor, 2C, Royal Non Corporate Ward 17(6), Enclave, Annai Indira Nagar, Okkyam Chennai. Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097. [Pan:Ajkpb3125C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Krishna Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 05.05.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 20.03.2024 Passed By The Addl./Jcit(A), Thane For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. We Note That This Appeal Was Filed On 03.02.2025 & After Scrutiny; The Registry Fixed The Appeal For Hearing On 28.04.2025. Accordingly, A Notice Dated 21.03.2025 Issued To The Assessee By Rpad Intimating The Said Date Of Hearing Along With A Defect Memo. We Note That The Assessee Rectified The Defect Notified By The Registry. When The Appeal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 69ASection 80E

Jayavel Manikandan, Salem vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Salem

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3063/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3063/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Jayavel Manikandan, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 475/127-C, Angammal Colony, Ward 1(2),Salem. Anna Street, Salem 636 009. [Pan:Auipm2974K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Srikrishna, C.A. (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. M.D. Vijay Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 03.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 05.03.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 31.05.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For The Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 122 Days. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay Explaining Reasons For The Said Delay & Prayed For Condonation Of That Delay. On Perusal Of The Condonation Petition & Upon Hearing Both The Parties, We Find That The 2

For Appellant: Shri Srikrishna, C.A. (Virtual)For Respondent: Dr. M.D. Vijay Kumar, JCIT
Section 142(1)