Section 128 of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 128 is Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy v. PCIT (460 ITR 615), cited in 50 of the 27 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 128

Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy v. PCIT
460 ITR 615 · 2024 · High Court
50
citing judgments

An assessee's claim for Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) cannot be rejected merely because Form 67 was filed after the due date under section 139(1), provided it is filed before the completion of assessment proceedings.

Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT
207 ITR 1 · 1994 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

When a statute prescribes a specific method for exercising a power, that power must be exercised only in the manner prescribed.

Rakesh Singh v. ACIT
26 Taxmann.com 240 · 2012 · Reported
19
citing judgments

A Commissioner is not justified in not admitting and adjudicating claims made by an appellant under sections 54B and 54F, especially when the Bangalore Tribunal's decision in Rakesh Singh v. ACIT (2012) is relevant.

Muralikrishna Vaddi v. ACIT/Dy.CIT
142 Taxmann.com 32 · 2022 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Furnishing Form 67 before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1) is mandatory for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC).

Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
49 Taxmann.com 208 · 2014 · High Court
9
citing judgments
K. Rajiv v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax
98 Taxmann.com 418 · 2018 · High Court
7
citing judgments
Sanjiv Gopal v. ADIT
198 ITD 411 · 2023 · ITAT
4
citing judgments
ITO v. Smt. Mandira D. Vakharia
250 ITR 432 · 2001 · High Court
4
citing judgments
Trib.), Priya Savina Murzello v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
148 Taxmann.com 472 · 2023 · ITAT
3
citing judgments
Power and Energy Consultants India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO
159 Taxmann.com 645 · 2024 · High Court
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 128