BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

271 results for “reassessment”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,144Delhi627Kolkata371Chennai322Jaipur309Raipur271Ahmedabad251Bangalore189Pune158Hyderabad143Amritsar139Rajkot103Patna101Chandigarh98Surat84Indore72Guwahati65Nagpur44Visakhapatnam36Cochin33Lucknow32Agra29Panaji27Ranchi25Dehradun22Jodhpur20Allahabad20Cuttack10Varanasi4Jabalpur3

Key Topics

Section 25072Addition to Income66Section 14865Section 14749Section 143(3)47Natural Justice35Limitation/Time-bar28TDS27Condonation of Delay21Section 69A

ACCURATE ASHRAY PVT. LTD., HOWRA,HOWRA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 178/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.177 & 178/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2014-15 Accurate Ashray Private Limited Ward No.39, Holding No. Koyla Dept. 28 No, Gali, P.S. Shibpur, Howrah-711 102 Pan: Aagca9943F

For Appellant: S/Shri Praveen Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 6 Accurate Ashray Private Limited Vs. Dy/Asst.CIT, Central Circle-1, Raipur (C.G.) ITA Nos.177 & 178/RPR/2026 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed

ACCURATE ASHRAY PVT. LTD., HOWRA,HOWRA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 271 · Page 1 of 14

...
15
Section 6914
Reopening of Assessment14
ITA 177/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.177 & 178/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2014-15 Accurate Ashray Private Limited Ward No.39, Holding No. Koyla Dept. 28 No, Gali, P.S. Shibpur, Howrah-711 102 Pan: Aagca9943F

For Appellant: S/Shri Praveen Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 6 Accurate Ashray Private Limited Vs. Dy/Asst.CIT, Central Circle-1, Raipur (C.G.) ITA Nos.177 & 178/RPR/2026 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed

REKHA CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 187/RPR/2026[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.187/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2023-24 Smt. Rekha Chandrakar C/O. Jyoti Enterprises, Megha Road, Kurud-493 663 Dhamtari (C.G) Pan: Auypc9672Q

For Appellant: Shri Prafulla Pendse, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the 6

SHIVANSH ENTERPRISES, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 182/RPR/2026[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.182/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2016-17 Shivansh Enterprises Plot No.11-H, Hathkhoj, Heavy Industrial Area, Bhilai-490 026 (C.G.) Pan: Abafs3020K

For Appellant: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

LAXMI KRIPA ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 101/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.101/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Laxmi Kripa Ispat Private Limited 578/596, Urla Industrial Area, Raipur (C.G.)-493 221 Pan: Aabcl4977D

For Appellant: Shri Bikram Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

NEETA GUPTA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 159/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.159/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Neena Gupta, H. No.26/976, Noorani Chowk, Raja Talab, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Adcpg8188L

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 150Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

J.R.P. BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 252/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.252/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 J.R.P Builders & Developers Quarter No.4, Road No.1, Sector-01, Professor Colony, Raipur-492 001 Pan: Aanfj6828Q

For Appellant: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

PRAKASH KUMAR CHAWLA,BILASPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 123/RPR/2026[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Raipur19 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.123/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Prakash Kumar Chawla Telipara, Bilaspur-495 001 (C.G.) Pan: Aappc2370L

For Appellant: None (petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

M/S SHREE ASSOCIATES, RAIGARH,RAIGARH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/RPR/2026[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Raipur19 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.124/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Shree Associates Ward No.14, Kotra Road, Raigarh-496 001 (C.G.) Pan: Abtfs9583J

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

M/S CHANDRAHASNI ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIGARH,RAIGARH vs. ACIT-CIRCLE 1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 700/RPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.700/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Chandrahasni Ispat Private Limited Village-Gerwani, Sarapali Road, Raigarh (C.G.)-496 001 Pan: Aaccc9257G

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Shri Raghunath, CIT-DR
Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 164/RPR/2026[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164, 165, 166, 167/Rpr/2026 & Ita Nos.170 & 171/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 Boppana Prasad Rao 7-5-99, Flat No.14, Punarvasu Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003 (A.P) Pan : Adcpb4083D

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 166/RPR/2026[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164, 165, 166, 167/Rpr/2026 & Ita Nos.170 & 171/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 Boppana Prasad Rao 7-5-99, Flat No.14, Punarvasu Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003 (A.P) Pan : Adcpb4083D

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 167/RPR/2026[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164, 165, 166, 167/Rpr/2026 & Ita Nos.170 & 171/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 Boppana Prasad Rao 7-5-99, Flat No.14, Punarvasu Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003 (A.P) Pan : Adcpb4083D

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 171/RPR/2026[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164, 165, 166, 167/Rpr/2026 & Ita Nos.170 & 171/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 Boppana Prasad Rao 7-5-99, Flat No.14, Punarvasu Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003 (A.P) Pan : Adcpb4083D

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/RPR/2026[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164, 165, 166, 167/Rpr/2026 & Ita Nos.170 & 171/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 Boppana Prasad Rao 7-5-99, Flat No.14, Punarvasu Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003 (A.P) Pan : Adcpb4083D

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the documents

NARAYAN SAHU, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ITO-1(2), RAIPUR, (ERSTWHILE ITO-2(2), RAIPUR), RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 209/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.209/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Narayan Sahu Madan Lal Sahu, Surya Nagar, Gogaon, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Cwsps2817K

For Appellant: None (Petition filed)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 250(4)

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts and circumstances involved in all the captioned appeals. After careful perusal of the 6

COLLECTOR MINING, KONDAGAON,KONDAGAON vs. DCIT(TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 771/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776 & 777/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20 Collector Mining, Kondagaon, Mining Office, Collectorate Campus, Kondagaon, Dist. Kondagaon (C.G)-494 226 Pan: Jbpc02652G

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 8 Collector Mining, Kondagaon Vs. DCIT (TDS), Raipur ITA Nos. 771 to 777/RPR/2025 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts

COLLECTOR MINING, KONDAGAON,KONDAGAON vs. DCIT(TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 774/RPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776 & 777/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20 Collector Mining, Kondagaon, Mining Office, Collectorate Campus, Kondagaon, Dist. Kondagaon (C.G)-494 226 Pan: Jbpc02652G

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 8 Collector Mining, Kondagaon Vs. DCIT (TDS), Raipur ITA Nos. 771 to 777/RPR/2025 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts

COLLECTOR MINING, KONDAGAON,KONDAGAON vs. DCIT(TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 777/RPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776 & 777/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20 Collector Mining, Kondagaon, Mining Office, Collectorate Campus, Kondagaon, Dist. Kondagaon (C.G)-494 226 Pan: Jbpc02652G

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 8 Collector Mining, Kondagaon Vs. DCIT (TDS), Raipur ITA Nos. 771 to 777/RPR/2025 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts

COLLECTOR MINING, KONDAGAON,KONDAGAON vs. DCIT(TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 773/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776 & 777/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20 Collector Mining, Kondagaon, Mining Office, Collectorate Campus, Kondagaon, Dist. Kondagaon (C.G)-494 226 Pan: Jbpc02652G

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

250(4) & (6) of the Act by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC 8 Collector Mining, Kondagaon Vs. DCIT (TDS), Raipur ITA Nos. 771 to 777/RPR/2025 which in fact is in the best interest of balancing the scales of justice. The relevant paras are as follows: “7. We have considered the submissions of the parties herein and analyzed the facts