URJA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., JAGDALPUR,JAGDALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, JAGDALPUR, JAGDALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(Appeals) and remanded the matter back for denovo adjudication. The assessee was granted one final opportunity to comply with the hearing notices and present the case on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(Appeals) due to non-compliance with hearing notices. The assessee contended that the matter should be remanded for denovo adjudication in the interest of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Appeals) due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside and remanded for denovo adjudication on merits, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar225 citing1 SCC 591 · 1985
- Vijay Shrinivasrao Kulkarni v. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal200 citing171 Taxmann.com 696 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals), Raipur-3 dated 30.01.2026 for the assessment year 2014-15 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
At the very outset, it is noted that an ex-parte order has been passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) vide paras 3 & 3.1 of the impugned order due to non-compliance by the assessee. There is no doubt of the fact that reasonable opportunities were
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026