M/S SHREE ASSOCIATES, RAIGARH,RAIGARH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BILASPUR, BILASPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(Appeals) and remanded the matter back for denovo adjudication. The assessee was granted one final opportunity to comply and present their case on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(Appeals) despite multiple opportunities, leading to an ex-parte order. The assessee did not file any adjournment petition for the current hearing before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Appeals) due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication on merits, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar225 citing1 SCC 591 · 1985
- Vijay Shrinivasrao Kulkarni v. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal200 citing171 Taxmann.com 696 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM: The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals), Raipur-3, dated 29.12.2025 for the assessment year 2013-14 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
At the time of hearing, none appeared for the assessee nor any adjournment petition has been filed. The matter is heard after recording the submissions of the Ld. Sr. DR and on careful perusal of the materials available on record.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026