BHOPPANA PRASAD RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), BHILAI, BHILAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(Appeals) and remanded the matters back for denovo adjudication. The assessee was directed to comply with hearing notices and represent the matters on merits, with the CIT(Appeals) to pass a speaking order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were dismissed by the CIT(Appeals) ex-parte due to non-compliance with notices. The assessee did not appear for the hearing before the ITAT, but had filed a petition for adjournment which was rejected.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte dismissal by the CIT(Appeals) for non-compliance warrants a remand to provide a final opportunity to the assessee, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
- Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar225 citing1 SCC 591 · 1985
- Vijay Shrinivasrao Kulkarni v. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal200 citing171 Taxmann.com 696 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The captioned appeals preferred by the assessee emanates from the respective orders of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 21.05.2024, 22.05.2024 for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2012-13 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
At the time of hearing, none appeared for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026