VIKAS CHHATRI, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte orders of the CIT(Appeals) and remanded the matters back for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to comply with future notices and present the case on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(Appeals) despite multiple opportunities, leading to ex-parte orders of dismissal for assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18. The assessee's counsel requested a remand for denovo adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Appeals) due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside and remanded for denovo adjudication on merits, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Commissioner of Income Tax Madras v. Chenniyappa Mudiliar225 citing1 SCC 591 · 1985
- Vijay Shrinivasrao Kulkarni v. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal200 citing171 Taxmann.com 696 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The captioned appeals preferred by the assessee emanates from the respective orders of the Ld.CIT(Appeals), Raipur-3 dated 27.01.2026 for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
At the very outset, it is noted that an ex-parte order has been passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) vide paras 4 & 5 of the impugned order due to non-compliance
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026