← All Phrases

“sundry creditors”

Cash Credits & Unexplained ItemsSection 68Section 681,806 judgments

The decision most relied on for sundry creditors is CIT v. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd. (343 ITR 408), cited in 76 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on sundry creditors

CIT v. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd.
343 ITR 408 · 2012 · High Court
76
citing judgments

An addition under Section 68 cannot be made for genuine sundry creditors or trade payables merely carried forward from previous assessment years if there is no fresh credit in the relevant assessment year. Section 41(1) does not apply to acknowledged outstanding liabilities without actual remission or cessation.

CIT v. Pancham Dass Jain
205 CTR 444 · 2006 · High Court
55
citing judgments

Section 68 of the Income-tax Act is not attracted to amounts representing purchases made on credit or outstanding trade creditors, especially when the genuineness of the purchases is accepted by the department.

CIT v. Prameshwar Bohra
301 ITR 404 · 2008 · High Court
47
citing judgments

An amount already credited in the books of account in an earlier assessment year cannot be added again as an unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act in a subsequent assessment year.

CIT v. Nitin S. Garg
208 Taxmann 16 · 2012 · High Court
47
citing judgments

A trading liability acknowledged and continued to be shown in the balance sheet cannot be treated as cessation of liability under Section 41(1) merely because it remained outstanding for several years, unless the assessee has written it off in its books. The Assessing Officer must prove that the assessee obtained a benefit.

CIT v. Bhogilal Ramjibhai Atara
43 Taxmann.com 55 · 2014 · High Court
43
citing judgments

Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act applies only where there is remission or cessation of a trading liability during the previous year relevant to the assessment year, and not merely because the assessee cannot provide confirmations for sundry creditors.

CIT v. Padamchand Ramgopal
76 ITR 719 · 1970 · Supreme Court
40
citing judgments

Minor irregularities in books of account cannot be the sole basis for rejection of the books or for making an estimated trading addition, especially when the assessee has provided explanations for discrepancies. The case distinguishes itself by focusing on receipts not brought into account rather than expenses claimed.

CIT v. Sita Devi Juneja
325 ITR 593 · 2010 · High Court
39
citing judgments

A liability cannot be presumed to have ceased to exist merely because it has been outstanding for several years. Without a bilateral act between the assessee and the creditor indicating cessation, additions under section 41(1) are not permissible.

CIT v. Best Wood Industries and Saw Mills
11 Taxmann.com 278 · 2011 · High Court
38
citing judgments

Once an assessment is reopened for a valid reason under Section 148(2), the Assessing Officer can bring to tax any escaped income that comes to their notice during the reassessment, even if it was not the original basis for reopening.

Judgments citing sundry creditors

Late Shri Kaliannagounder Sundaramoorthy, Rep. by Sundaramoorthy Sangeetha, Coimbatore vs. ACIT, Ncc-2, Coimbatore

The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2052/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2052/Chny/2024 (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Ms. Sundaramoorthy Sangeetha Acit L/H Of Late Shri Kaliannagounder Non-Corporate Circle-2, बनाम/ Sundaramoorthy Coimbatore. 770,/12, Avinashi Road, Vs. Civil Aerodrome Post, Coimbatore-641 014. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Ackps-1316-F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri S. Sricharan (Ca) For Mr. N.V. Balaji, Advocate - Ld. Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ashwin D Gowda (Addl.Cit) - Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-10-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21-10-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S. Sricharan (CA) for Mr. N.V. BalajiFor Respondent: Shri Ashwin D Gowda (Addl.CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of Rs.117.68 Lacs which represent sundry creditors. During appellate proceedings, the assessee failed to appear before Ld. CIT(A) and accordingly, the assessment was confirmed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has pleaded for another opportunity

Harish Chanana, Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 3508/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Sh. Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 Harish Chanana Vs Ito Sd-185, Pitampura Ward- 39 (1) Delhi New Delhi Pan No.Aafpc2783D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellants By Sh. Pranav Yadav, Advocate Respondent By Sh. Ramesh Chand, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 29/08/2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 09/10/2024 Order Per Sudhir Kumar, Jm: The Above Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Xxviii, New Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”], Vide Order Dated 15.09.2010 Pertaining To A.Y.2007-08 Arises Out Of The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Dated 21.12.2009 U/S 144 Of The Income Tax Act,1961[Hereinafter Referred As ‘The Act’]

Section 144

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) erred in confirming the addition of Rs.55,000/- made by the assessing officer on account of alleged unexplained sundry creditors. 4. On the facts and circumstances of case and in law, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) erred in confirming the addition of Rs.44 ... confirmation and documentary evidences on record, the AO made the addition of Rs.80,000/-. Further there is an increase in the account of sundry creditors of Rs.55,000/-. The AO further noted that balance-sheet of the assessee shows an amount of Rs. 44 lakhs under the Head “Advance against

Gng Exports, Kolkata vs. ACIT, Cir. 33, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 475/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.475/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Gng Exports……..……………….………...........………………....Appellant 202, Lords, 7/1, Lord Sinha Road, Rabindra Sadan, Kolkata – 700071. [Pan: Aacfg59994P] Vs. Acit, Circle-33, Kolkata.……………….…............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Ramesh Kumar Patodia, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. Cit- Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : July 09, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 08, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 11.01.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Is Aggrieved By The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) In Directing The Assessing Officer To Estimate The Net Profit Of The Assessee @ 0.77% Of The Total Turnover.

Section 133(6)Section 250

assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee in its balance sheet had claimed an amount of Rs.21,32,57,979/- towards sundry creditors. On being asked to furnish the necessary details, the assessee furnished a list of persons to whom the aforesaid payment was I.T.A. No.475/Kol/2024 Assessment Year ... also deducted TDS, wherever applicable. Even, out of 21 parties, whom the notices could not be served, only 7 parties were related to sundry creditors and there were no majority transactions with them. The ld. CIT(A), considering the aforesaid submissions, observed that the rejection of books of account