CIT v. Nitin S. Garg
208 Taxmann 16High Court2012#2488 most cited
What is CIT v. Nitin S. Garg authority for?
A trading liability acknowledged and continued to be shown in the balance sheet cannot be treated as cessation of liability under Section 41(1) merely because it remained outstanding for several years, unless the assessee has written it off in its books. The Assessing Officer must prove that the assessee obtained a benefit.
47
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Nitin S. Garg · Section 41(1) · cessation of trading liability · sundry creditors · outstanding liabilities · acknowledgement of liability · balance sheet · written off · Assessing Officer onus
Also reported as
22 Taxmann.com 59
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Nitin S. Garg
Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3