← All Phrases

“Section 64(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 64Section 64(2)6 judgments

POOJA BHATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 6564/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence

OM PRAKASH BHATIA & SONS,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 6563/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence

SHRI OM PRAKASH BHATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 3270/DEL/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence

SHRI OM PRAKASH BHATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 3269/DEL/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence

SH OM PRAKASH BHATIA (HUF),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 1556/DEL/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence

SH OM PRAKASH BHATIA (HUF),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual)

ITA 1555/DEL/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

Section 64

thus AO rejected the status of HUF but in the same breath, the ld. AO applies the provisions of section 64(2) of the Act which inherently implies the Page 8 of 27 ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. existence