SHRI OM PRAKASH BHATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of Om Prakash Bhatia (individual) for AY 2006-07, finding that an addition based solely on a retracted surrender without corroborative evidence was not sustainable. The appeals for AY 2007-08 were decided based on the findings for AY 2005-06.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned the existence of a HUF and the validity of assessments made on both the individual and the alleged HUF. A search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to notices under Section 153A.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the existence and validity of the HUF. Another key issue was whether additions could be made based on a retracted surrender without supporting evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 153A,Section 64(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala666 citing91 ITR 18 · 1973 · SC
- Arjun Singh v. CWT38 citing175 ITR 91 · 1989 · HC
- 140 ITR 8406 citing140 ITR 840 · 1983
- CIT v. K Satyendra Kumar6 citing232 ITR 360 · SC
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Pooja Bhatia ACIT L/H Late Om Prakash Central Circle-17 31/B-8, Rajpura Road Delhi-110 054 PAN-AAOPB 9342E (Appellant) (Respondent) Pooja Bhatia Income Tax Officer L/H Late Om Prakash Ward-29(2) 31/B-8, Rajpura Road Delhi-110 054 PAN-AAOPB 9342E (Appellant) (Respondent) Late Om Prakash Bhatia ACIT 606/607, Katra Ishwar Central Circle-17 PAN-AADPB 7746H (Appellant) (Respondent)
ITA No.3269/Del/2009 & Ors Pooja Bhatia, L/H Late Om Prakash Bhatia vs. ACIT & Ors. Om Prakash Bhatia & Income Tax Officer Sons (HUF) Ward-29(2) 31-B/8, Rajpura Road Vs. New Delhi New Delhi PAN-AAAHO 2991L (Appellant) (Respondent) Om Prakash Bhatia (HUF) Asst.CIT C/o M/s RRA Taxindia Central Circle-17 D-28, South Extension Vs. New Delhi Part-I New Delhi-110 049 PAN-AAAHO 2991L (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by Dr. Rakesh Gupta and Sh. Somil Agarwal, Advocates Respondent by Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-D
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026