← All Phrases

“Section 201(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 201Section 201(1)1,701 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 201(1) is Kourani v. Union OF India (83 Taxmann.com 137), cited in 1,708 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 201(1)

Kourani v. Union OF India
83 Taxmann.com 137 · 2017 · High Court
1,708
citing judgments

The fee under Section 234E for late filing of TDS/TCS statements cannot be levied retrospectively by processing an intimation under Section 200A for defaults occurring before the amendment allowing such processing.

Fateh Raj Singhvi & Ors. v. UOI
289 CTR 602 · 2016 · High Court
844
citing judgments

A fee under Section 234E cannot be levied or adjusted in an intimation under Section 200A for TDS statements pertaining to periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the enabling amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) came into effect only from that date.

Rashmikant Kundalia v. Union of India
54 Taxmann.com 200 · 2015 · High Court
702
citing judgments

Section 234E, levying late fees for delayed filing of TDS statements under section 200(3), is constitutionally valid and constitutes a compensatory fee, not a punitive penalty. Before treating any person as an assessee-in-default, an opportunity of being heard must be provided.

GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
327 ITR 456 · 2010 · Supreme Court
663
citing judgments

Tax must be deducted at source from payments made to a non-resident under Section 195 only if such payment is chargeable to tax in India. The Assessing Officer bears the onus to establish that the payments made are indeed chargeable to tax under the Income Tax Act.

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
293 ITR 226 · 2007 · Supreme Court
576
citing judgments

The deductor cannot be treated as an assessee-in-default under Section 201(1) if the deductee has already paid the tax or offered the impugned receipts in their return of income. However, interest under Section 201(1A) for delayed deposit of tax can still be levied up to the date of filing of the return of income by the deductee.

Gajanan Constructions v. DCIT
74 Taxmann.com 6 · 2016 · ITAT
465
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E can only be levied prospectively from June 1, 2015. Levying late fees for periods prior to this date is not permissible.

Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. Union of India
63 Taxmann.com 243 · 2015 · High Court
397
citing judgments

The imposition of fees for late filing of TDS/TCS returns prior to the Finance Act, 2015 amendments was not illegal, and the Rajasthan High Court found no justification to interfere with such compensatory fees.

CIT v. Ansal Land Mark Township (P) Ltd.
377 ITR 635 · 2015 · High Court
369
citing judgments

The second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia), introduced by the Finance Act, 2012, is curative and applies retrospectively from April 1, 2005. Consequently, if the recipient of a payment has filed their return and paid taxes on the amount from which tax was not deducted at source, the payer's expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia).

Judgments citing Section 201(1)

State Bank of India, Overseas Branch, 15/54B, Civil Lines, Kanpur vs. Dy. CIT(TDS), Kanpur

ITA 187/LKW/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.186/Lkw/2022 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 State Bank Of India Zonal Office, The Mall Road, Kanpur, Up-208001 Tan: Knps02318B . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds, Kanpur . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent & आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.187/Lkw/2022 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 State Bank Of India Overseas Branch, 15/54B, Civil Lines, Kanpur, Up-208001 Tan: Knps01627D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds, Kanpur . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee By : None For The Assessee Revenue By : Mr Sk Sharma [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 09/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/07/2024 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; These Twin Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against The Separate Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1045081675(1) & 1045081558(1) Both Dt. 31/08/2022 Orders Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act [‘The Act’ In Short] By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’ In Short] Confirming The Order Dt. 21/03/2018 Passed U/S 201(1) & 201(1A) Of The Act By The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-51(1), Nagpur [‘Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Year 2011- 12 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter]

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr SK Sharma [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 24Section 246A(1)(ha)Section 250

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH LUCKNOW BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI

State Bank of India, Zonal Office, the Mall Road, Kanpur vs. Dy. CIT(TDS), Kanpur

ITA 186/LKW/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.186/Lkw/2022 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 State Bank Of India Zonal Office, The Mall Road, Kanpur, Up-208001 Tan: Knps02318B . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds, Kanpur . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent & आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.187/Lkw/2022 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 State Bank Of India Overseas Branch, 15/54B, Civil Lines, Kanpur, Up-208001 Tan: Knps01627D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds, Kanpur . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee By : None For The Assessee Revenue By : Mr Sk Sharma [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 09/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/07/2024 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; These Twin Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against The Separate Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1045081675(1) & 1045081558(1) Both Dt. 31/08/2022 Orders Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act [‘The Act’ In Short] By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Nfac’ In Short] Confirming The Order Dt. 21/03/2018 Passed U/S 201(1) & 201(1A) Of The Act By The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-51(1), Nagpur [‘Ao’ Hereinafter] Anent To Assessment Year 2011- 12 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter]

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr SK Sharma [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 24Section 246A(1)(ha)Section 250

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH LUCKNOW BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI

Sulekha.Com New Media Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT TDS Circle 3(1), Chennai

In the result, all four these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1325/CHNY/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1322, 1323, 1324 & 1325/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-2022) Sulekha.Com New Media Private Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 2Nd Floor Campus, Tds Circle 3(1) 1A Rmz Millenia Business Park, Chennai. 143, Dr. Mgr Main Road, Perungudi, Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600 096. [Pan: Aadcm 6938R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.A., ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Four Appeals Being Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023 Filed By The Assessee Sulekha.Com New India Private Limited Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 27.09.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of 2 Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023

For Appellant: Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 194JSection 201(1)

assessee to the notice dated 11.07.2022. However, a letter dated 16.12.2021 was filed by the assessee. The AO passed an order under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) dated 16.12.2022 wherein AO held the assessee as ‘deemed to be an assessee

Sulekha.Com New Media Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT TDS Circle 3(1), Chennai

In the result, all four these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1324/CHNY/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1322, 1323, 1324 & 1325/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-2022) Sulekha.Com New Media Private Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 2Nd Floor Campus, Tds Circle 3(1) 1A Rmz Millenia Business Park, Chennai. 143, Dr. Mgr Main Road, Perungudi, Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600 096. [Pan: Aadcm 6938R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.A., ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Four Appeals Being Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023 Filed By The Assessee Sulekha.Com New India Private Limited Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 27.09.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of 2 Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023

For Appellant: Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 194JSection 201(1)

assessee to the notice dated 11.07.2022. However, a letter dated 16.12.2021 was filed by the assessee. The AO passed an order under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) dated 16.12.2022 wherein AO held the assessee as ‘deemed to be an assessee

Sulekha.Com New Media Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT TDS Circle 3(1) Chennai, Chennai

In the result, all four these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1323/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1322, 1323, 1324 & 1325/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-2022) Sulekha.Com New Media Private Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 2Nd Floor Campus, Tds Circle 3(1) 1A Rmz Millenia Business Park, Chennai. 143, Dr. Mgr Main Road, Perungudi, Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600 096. [Pan: Aadcm 6938R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.A., ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Four Appeals Being Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023 Filed By The Assessee Sulekha.Com New India Private Limited Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 27.09.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of 2 Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023

For Appellant: Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 194JSection 201(1)

assessee to the notice dated 11.07.2022. However, a letter dated 16.12.2021 was filed by the assessee. The AO passed an order under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) dated 16.12.2022 wherein AO held the assessee as ‘deemed to be an assessee

Sulekha.Com New Media Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT TDS Circle 3(1), Chennai

In the result, all four these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1322/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.1322, 1323, 1324 & 1325/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-2022) Sulekha.Com New Media Private Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 2Nd Floor Campus, Tds Circle 3(1) 1A Rmz Millenia Business Park, Chennai. 143, Dr. Mgr Main Road, Perungudi, Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600 096. [Pan: Aadcm 6938R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.A., ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl.Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri () This Bunch Of Four Appeals Being Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023 Filed By The Assessee Sulekha.Com New India Private Limited Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of Even Date 27.09.2023 Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of 2 Ita Nos.1322-1325/Chny/2023

For Appellant: Shri. V. Ravichandran, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl.CIT
Section 194JSection 201(1)

assessee to the notice dated 11.07.2022. However, a letter dated 16.12.2021 was filed by the assessee. The AO passed an order under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) dated 16.12.2022 wherein AO held the assessee as ‘deemed to be an assessee

Ahlers India Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT, Corp Circle 1(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 524/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 524/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Ahlers India Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner No.39, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Of Income Tax,, The Trapezium, Corporate Circle 1(1), Nelson Manickam Road, Chennai. Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029. Pan: Aaeca 5688H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.06.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi In Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1059291012 (1) Dated 02.01.2024. The Assessment Was Framed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Circle 1(1), Chennai For The Assessment Year 2010-11 U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’) Vide Order Dated 16.02.2016. The Impugned Giving Effect To The Order Of The Tribunal Was Framed By The Dcit, Corporate Circle 1(1), Chennai Vide Order Dated 22.08.2017. 2. The Only Issue In This Appeal Of Assessee Is Against The Order Of Cit(A)-Nfac Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Disallowing Expenses Paid To Various Non-Resident Parties For Non-Deduction Of Tds By Invoking The Provisions Of Section 40(A)(I) Of The Act Amounting To Rs.2,26,73,426/-. This Is The Only Limited Issue On Merits But Assessee Has Raised Various Other Issues Of Proper Opportunity Etc., Which Will Be Dealt With Later.

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 201(1)Section 40

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ,चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी महावीर "सह, उपा"य